The Lonely Speck Gift Guide 2015: Our Favorite Astrophotography Gear

Lonely Speck Gift Guide 2015

In this article I talk about our favorite gear, some of which has helped shape our world of landscape astrophotography. Check out what we’re looking to buy this holiday season and why.

Introduction

We saw the introduction of a lot of amazing gear in 2015 but there are a few things that stand out in particular to us. Many of these pieces of gear have helped make simple astrophotography more accessible to the world and I think they deserve a note here in our gift guide. I have personally used most of the gear listed on this page and the ones that I have not are likely to be in one of my next gear reviews or to find their way into my camera bag.

I’ve tried to keep the scope of this list narrowed to gear that’s especially great for the type of astrophotography that we like to do at Lonely Speck. Most of it was introduced in 2015, but there are a few exceptions and older models that I think still stand out of the crowd. OK, let’s take a look at what we recommend and why.

Cameras

Let me start this section by saying that almost every modern digital camera is capable of making photographs of the night sky. Even some smartphones are starting to gain some basic capability for shooting the Milky Way. That said, there are some cameras that I think are particularly exceptional as an astrophotography tool and I’ve listed them here, in no particular order.

Sony RX100III

Sony RX100III for Astrophotography

The RX100III is my favorite compact camera for shooting astrophotos.

The RX100III has a special place in my bag. For such a small camera, it’s seriously good. You can read our full astrophotography review here. For its size, it meets or exceeds the capability of most entry level DSLR kits.

Milky Way Astrophotography with the Sony RX100III

Milky Way from Great Sand Dunes National Park, Colorado. Sony RX100III, 8.8mm, f/2, ISO 1600, 54 x 20 seconds

I used the RX100III exclusively this summer when my full frame camera needed to be sent in for repair and it delivered some spectacular results. It stands alone as the only truly pocketable camera that I highly recommend. Also available is the new RX100IV which offers increased video capability in an identical body. I personally prefer the slightly older RX100III for its lower price-point.

Buy it at:
Amazon: Sony RX100 III
B&H: Sony RX100 III

Nikon D750

Nikon D750 for Astrophotography

The Nikon D750 is the only full frame DSLR to feature a tilt-screen.

Nikon’s D750 is best full-frame DSLR available on the market in my opinion. Its low light performance, tilting display, price-point, and excellent ergonomics make it the first DSLR I would recommend for astrophotography. Also consider the Nikon 810A for its improved low-light capability in increased resolution but I still prefer the D750 for its tilting display. It’s the only full-frame DSLR with a tilting display (why?) and that automatically makes night landscape shooting that much better.

Buy it at:
Amazon: Nikon D750
B&H: Nikon D750

Sony a7SII

Sony a7SII for Astrophotography

The Sony a7SII’s sensor has the brightest live-view feed of any on the market making focusing and framing for astrophotography very easy.

The original Sony a7S is still one of my most recommended cameras and that makes the new a7SII an almost automatic recommendation for me. The larger pixels on the a7S and a7SII sensor make framing and focusing in the dark super easy, there is simply no other consumer level image sensor on the market that has the same capability.

trona-1400px

Lone Pinnacle and the Milky Way. Sony a7S, 50mm, f/4, ISO 12800, 14 x 8s stitch

I’ve also been using the cheaper a7II extensively while I travel, particularly for its in body image stabilization. The stabilization is great for video work and the camera’s improved ergonomics help when using larger lenses. Now that the low-light capability of the a7S and improved features of the a7II are combined in the a7SII, I’m definitely going to switch around my kit to include the a7SII, particularly in anticipation of making more in-the-field video tutorials and reviews to be featured here on Lonely Speck. Also consider the original a7S which houses the same excellent sensor, or the a7RII which has nearly the same low-light stills performance but with increased sensor resolution. If the best all-around low-light experience is what you want, video and stills alike, the a7SII has no match.

Buy it at:
Amazon: Sony a7SII
B&H: Sony a7SII

Sony a6000

Sony a6000

The Sony a6000 is one of the best bang-for-the-buck cameras.

When someone asks me which affordable camera they should buy, my first recommendation is always the Sony a6000. At the time of writing I think the a6000 offers the most desirable features of any camera available for less than $500. It’s extremely lightweight, shows good (although not best in class) low-light performance, has a fast growing selection of lenses, and has a tilt-screen, all things that I look for in an astrophotography camera. Also consider the Fujifilm X-T10 which is a little bit more expensive than the a6000 but offers better low-light performance and all the things I loved about the X-T1 (full review). If the best bang-for-your-buck is a priority, the a6000 won’t disappoint.

portage-alaska-aurora-2048-4

Aurora Borealis from Portage, Alaska shot on the Sony a6000. 10mm, f/4, 10s, ISO 1600

I used the a6000 almost exclusively for photographing the aurora borealis while visiting Alaska recently and it performed very well in those low-light conditions, even with the relatively slow Sony E 10-18mm f/4 lens.

Buy it at:
Amazon: Sony a6000
B&H: Sony a6000

Pentax K-3 II

Pentax K-3II for Astrophotography

The Pentax K-3 II is arguably the most advanced Digital SLRs ever made.

Pentax has been one of the lesser talked about camera companies lately, especially as Sony has been stealing the spotlight with their latest mirrorless cameras. That said, the Pentax K-3 II is, in my opinion, the most interesting, and arguably most capable, APS-C DSLR on the market. In fact, I think it’s better than most full-frame DSLRs in both features and image quality capability.

Its built-in Astrotracer function uses GPS and the camera’s in body image stabilization system to track the stars automatically, allowing for exposures as long as 5 minutes with no star trailing! There is no other camera company putting such advance features in a camera. It’s almost like having a Vixen Polarie or iOptron SkyTracker built-in to your camera.

Furthermore, it features a separate pixel-shift resolution function that uses the concept of superresolution to greatly enhance the fine detail and clarity of your photographs. The pixel-shift mode is not specifically geared towards astrophotography (it can’t be enabled at the same time as Astrotracer) but for daytime landscapes and studio shooting, it allows the K-3 II to match or even exceed the image quality of a much higher resolution camera (dpreview.com), like the Canon 5DSR.

Buy it at:
Amazon: Pentax K-3 II
B&H: Pentax K-3 II

Lenses

We love fast wide angle lenses. They’re our first recommendation as a lens that will show tangible improvements for landscape astrophotography. The lenses here stand out as being some of the most recent and most wanted lenses for landscape astrophotography. I would be happy having any of them in my camera bag.

Zeiss Batis 25mm f/2

Zeiss Batis 25mm f/2 for Astrophotography

The Zeiss Batis is my most wanted lens for Sony E Mount.

For full-frame Sony cameras, the Batis 25mm f/2 is the one camera lens that I personally want most. I love the 24mm-ish focal length for capturing the Milky Way.  If there’s a first and best native landscape astrophotography lens for the Sony E Mount, it’s probably the Batis 25mm f/2. Weather sealing, a fast aperture, excellent sharpness and electronic depth of field scale are its standout features. At a lower price point, also consider the slightly less wide, but nearly as excellent Sony 28mm f/2 (full review).

Buy it at:
B&H: Zeiss Batis 25mm f/2

Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8

Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8 for Astrophotography

The Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8 is a legendary landscape lens.

The Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8 is legendary in the landscape photography community. It’s simply the most recommended landscape lens for the Nikon system. There is no lens that offers quite the same mix of field of view, image quality and build quality. For those on a budget that might not mind a lower quality build can also consider the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 (full review) or Rokinon 24mm f/1.4 (full review).

Buy it at:
Amazon: Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8
B&H: Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8

Rokinon/Samyang 12mm f/2

Rokinon 12mm f/2 for Astrophotography

The Rokinon 12mm f/2 is my favorite lens for APS-C Mirrorless Cameras.

The Rokinon 12mm f/2 (full review) is the first lens I recommend for the Sony a6000, Fujifilm X-T1 and other APS-C mirrorless cameras. It has all the best elements of a good landscape astrophotography lens.

Rokinon-12mm-f2-NCS-CS-Review-Thumb-24

Diana at Anza Borrego State Park, California. Rokinon 12mm, f/2, 20s, ISO 3200

It features a wide field of view, fast f/2 aperture, nice manual focus ring and excellent coma performance all at an affordable price. There’s really nothing quite comparable to the Rokinon 12mm f/2 for APS-C mirrorless cameras. I even recommend it over the much more expensive Zeiss Touit 12mm f/2.8.

Buy it at:
Amazon: Rokinon 12mm f/2
B&H: Rokinon 12mm f/2

Rokinon/Samyang 21mm f/1.4

The Rokinon 21mm f/1.4 is the fastest 21mm lens available for APS-C mirrorless cameras.

The Rokinon 21mm f/1.4 is the most affordable, fast 21mm lens available on the market. It’s specifically cited by the manufacturer as having excellent coma performance which should make it perfect for astrophotography. It was just released and at the time of this writing, have not gotten to use it but it’s the most voted upon lens for us to review. Photographers using APS-C mirrorless cameras that want a lens that mimics the field of view and light gathering capability of a full frame 28mm f/2 lens (like the Sony 28mm f/2 that we love so much) should get the Rokinon 21mm f/1.4. Like the 12mm/2 mentioned above, there isn’t really anything directly comparable to it for APS-C mirrorless cameras.

Buy it at:
Amazon: Rokinon 21mm f/1.4
B&H: Rokinon 21mm f/1.4

Tools

SharpStar by Lonely Speck

SharpStar Precision Focusing Tool by Lonely Speck

Okay, shameless plug here for our SharpStar focusing aid. SharpStar is a special kind of mask that mounts in front of your camera lens with a square filter holder (sold separately).  It produces diffraction spikes around bright stars that shift with focus position and give a really distinct indication of focus success. No more questioning your focus, just perfectly focused images every time. It’s compatible with most lenses 35mm and longer so I recommend it for use with panorama stitching applications. The SharpStar is open for pre-orders at an early-bird price through November 27th and we anticipate shipping in December. Read more about the SharpStar here.

Buy it at:
Lonely Speck: SharpStar Focusing Aid

Petzl Tikka RXP Headlamp

Petzl Tikka RXP Headlamp for Astrophotography

The Petzl Tikka RXP can recharge with any micro USB cable.

The Peztl Tikka RXP is the only lithium powered, USB rechargeable headlamp on the market that also features a red night-vision mode and more than 200 lumen output. It’s water resistant and programmable for variable reactive brightness as low as 7 lumens.

sony-rx100iii-astrophotography-review-lonelyspeck-2

My most recommended headlamp is the Petzl Tikka RXP.

I like the Tikka RXP in particular because it’s rechargeable on-the-go with any micro USB cable. That means I can top it off with my portable lithium USB battery (see below). Also consider the cheaper (but less bright) Petzl Tikka R+ which offers most of the same features as the brighter RXP.

Buy it at:
Amazon: Petzl Tikka RXP

Fenix UC35

Fenix UC35 Flashlight for Astrophotography

The Fenix UC35 is USB rechargeable with a 960 lumen output.

Sometimes you just need an ultra-bright backup flashlight/torch. I usually stick with a headlamp the whole night but it can be reassuring to have a nice ultra-bright backup for the hike back or those times when you just need a little reassurance in the dark. The Fenix UC35 is 960 lumens bright (that’s wicked bright) which makes it perfect for long distance light painting. I also offers USB recharging, an easy to find rear on/off/momentary switch, and variable brightness as low as 14 lumens. It even has a lanyard lug if you want to use it on the end of a shoelace for making light painted orbs and light rings.

x-e1 milky way portrait alabama hills

Samantha and Sammy at Alabama Hills, California. X-E1, 18mm, f/2.0, 20s, ISO 5000, flashlight on a shoelace.

Buy it at:
Amazon: Fenix UC35
B&H: Fenix UC35

Oben CT-3451 Carbon Fiber Tripod

Oben CT-3451 for Astrophotography

The Oben CT-3451 fold compact while still extending to a height of up to 61.3″

I’ve had a small travel tripod called the Sirui T-025X in my bag for years now. It’s one of the smallest and lightest carbon fiber tripods available but it lacks a little bit in the stability department, does not have an adjustable height center column, and doesn’t extend very high. The Oben CT-3451 features everything I liked about the T-025X but offers the adjustable height center column and the extra 6″ of height that I wanted. It also features a removable leg that can be used as a monopod. It weighs only 2.5 pounds and its legs swivel up 180 degrees which let it fold to 17″ short.

Buy it at:
Amazon: Oben CT-3451
B&H: Oben CT-3451

Anker USB Battery

Anker USB Battery for Astrophotography and Timelapse

A USB Battery is one of the most convenient options for extending your gear’s operating time in the field.

Many new cameras like the Fujifilm X-T10, and Sony Alpha camera can recharge via a micro USB cable. When I’m doing an overnight backpacking trip, I carry a 10000 mAh Anker Astro E3 USB battery with me. It allows me to recharge a camera multiple times and, with certain cameras like the Sony a7SII, can allow the camera to operate while charging for extended shooting periods. This is a perfect solution for running a long overnight timelapse. It can also recharge the two lights I recommended above: the Tikka RXP and Fenix UC35. With a large enough capacity USB battery, like the 26800 maH Astro E7, it’s even possible to re-charge certain USB-C compatible laptop computers, like the new 12″ Macbook.

Buy it at:
Amazon: Anker Astro E3 10000 mAh Battery

Digital Goodies

My Nightscapes: Landscape Astrophotography Course on Skillshare

Nightscapes Skillshare Class Promo Poster

Another shameless plug, this time for my Nightscapes online video course with Skillshare. I walk through the full spectrum of beginning astrophotography in a 30 minute video course. Your assignment is to capture a self portrait using the Milky Way as your background. I cover scouting, equipment, shooting and processing. Check out the course preview on Skillshare.

PhotoPills for iOS

photopill-screenshots

PhotoPills offers one of the best Milky Way planning functions.

PhotoPills is the best app for photography planning and it has some excellent tools specifically geared towards photographing the Milky Way. If you have an Apple device, get PhotoPills, it’s as simple as that.

Buy it at:
iTunes App Store: PhotoPills

PlanIt! Pro for Android

PlanIt! Pro for Astrophotography

PlanIt! Pro offers a lot of excellent features for Milky Way photographers.

While PhotoPills is still not available for Android, PlanIt! Pro is very close in function and capability. I’m personally an Android phone user so PlanIt! is my new go-to app. It includes a ton of Astrophotography oriented features like moonrise/set times and angles, galactic plane mapping, Bortle scale light pollution maps, and field of view visualization. If you have an Android device, get PlanIt! Pro.

Buy it at:
Google Play: PlanIt! Pro for Photographers

SkyGuide for iOS

sky-guide-screenshots

SkyGuide for iOS has the best photorealistic representation of the Milky Way of any planetarium app.

SkyGuide is still the best and first recommended planetarium app on the market. It has a visually accurate and high resolution representation of the entire night sky and Milky Way and that alone makes it the best app to have for pre-visualizing what the night sky will look like in your photographs.

Buy it at:
iTunes App Store: SkyGuide

Stellarium Mobile for Android

stellarium-mobile-screenshots

Stellarium Mobile offers detailed night sky information and an accurate representation of the Milky Way.

While SkyGuide is not available for Android, Stellarium Mobile comes pretty close. It too has a visually accurate (albeit much lower resolution) representation of the night sky and the Milky Way. It’s the only app on Android that I’ve found that comes close to the usefulness of Sky Guide.

Buy it at:
Google Play: Stellarium Mobile

Where to Buy Camera Gear

I personally buy almost all of my equipment through Amazon and B&H. Each are some of the most reputable online retailers, they both have an excellent return policy and are guaranteed to have the lowest prices anywhere online. If you are considering buying something from our gift guide, or any equipment for that matter, consider buying through the affiliate links on this page. You won’t pay anything extra, but Lonely Speck will receive a small commission (usually 2-4%) to help run the website.

Learn Astrophotography

Astrophotography 101 is completely free for everyone. All of the lessons will be available on the Lonely Speck Astrophotography 101 page for you to access at any time. Enter your email and whenever we post a new lesson you’ll receive it in your inbox. We won’t spam you and your email will stay secure. Furthermore, updates will be sent out only periodically, usually less than once per week.

Join 7 282 other subscribers.

Help us help you!

Believe it or not, Lonely Speck is a full-time job. It’s been an amazing experience for us to see a community develop around learning astrophotography and we’re so happy to be a small part of it. I have learned that amazing things happen when you ask for help so remember that we are always here for you. If you have any questions about photography or just want to share a story, contact us! If you find the articles here helpful, consider helping us out with a donation.

Donate

Once again, the biggest contribution comes from the use of our affiliate links. When you buy through the links on Lonely Speck, it costs you nothing extra, but we will receive a small commission to help run the site.

Thanks so much for being a part of our astrophotography adventure.

-Ian

*This article originally suggested the Sigma 20mm f/1.4 Art lens but due to user reports of poor coma performance, it has been removed. (5/17/2016)

lonely-speck-logo-icon-16px



Ian Norman

Creator at Lonely Speck
Ian Norman, co-founder and creator of The Photon Collective and Lonely Speck. Ian is a full time traveler, photographer and entrepreneur. In February 2013, he called it quits on his 9-to-5 to pursue a lifestyle of photography. Follow Ian's photography adventures on Instagram.

31 Responses

  1. Greg Bradley November 23, 2016 / 11:26 am

    I have the Batis 25 and Loxia 21. The Loxia 21 at the moment is my goto lens for Milky Way imaging but Batis 25 is also good. It has slight coma in the corners wide open but that corrects easily with the distortion slider in Lightroom. F2 is that bit bright and 25/2 is a wider aperture than 21/2.8.
    Have you compared the Batis 25 to the 18? I was wondering if its worth going for the Batis 18 given I have the Loxia 21 and they are quite close in focal length.
    What do you think?

    There is also a Laowa 15mm F2.8 coming out shortly. It may be a super lens.

    Your website is a terrific resource, my hat is off to you.

    Greg.

  2. Yusuf September 19, 2016 / 7:55 am

    Seriously, I don’t see any Canon products in your list, are they that bad?

  3. Mark September 13, 2016 / 3:32 am

    I have a Canon 6D. I am thinking of going to a f1.4 lense. Which one would you suggest?

    • Mark September 13, 2016 / 3:34 am

      I meant to say a 24mm lense

  4. J May 21, 2016 / 5:24 am

    Hi Ian! I was wondering if the Anker USB battery worked with the Sony RX100 Series?

  5. Chris May 16, 2016 / 12:22 pm

    Hi Ian!
    I had the Sigma Art 20mm 1.4 on the Sony A7s with MC-11 adapter. I sold that lens after one week. The coma is simply awful. Even at f5.6!! It is very noticable in the corners. At lower fstops you have coma all over the frame. It is terrible. What sens has a wideangle lens with a aperture of 1.4 if not for astrophotography? Another issue is the distortion on the edges. With the MC-11 adapter it shows a near fisheye effect. Last bad point, its not weatherseald in any way. Now i got the tamron 15 30. Nearly the same price. Perfect!

    • Ian Norman May 17, 2016 / 12:53 am

      Thanks for the feedback Chris, I’ll amend the article to not include this lens based on user reports.

  6. Joe March 21, 2016 / 8:54 am

    Wondering if you’ve seen anything on the new 1″ sensor Nikon DL18-50 and have any thoughts on how it will compare to the RX100IV?

  7. Stephen February 22, 2016 / 9:28 pm

    Hi Ian. I’ve been interested in getting into milky way nightscape photography and time lapses for quite awhile and looking to purchase some equipment for the first time. After reading some of your earlier posts (along with some other sources) I had been narrowing my search to either the A7s or 6D, paired with the Rokinon 14mm. I just came across this more recent gear list and noticed that the 6D has fallen off. Do you think these are still good options to be considering? Alternatively I could save some dollars and go with one of the crop sensors you have listed here, or spend a bit more for the Nikon D750. Anything beyond that is definitely more than I’m interested in spending. I realize there’s never a cut and dry answer for this type of question, but then again, you may have a strong opinion.

    Thanks!

  8. John January 29, 2016 / 10:57 am

    Hi Ian,

    I have a question. Shouldn’t a Sony a7ii work just as well for astrophotography as the Sony aS7ii if I use a star tracker with the a7ii? That way I could shoot at a relatively low ISO (ISO 800) and at a longer exposure time (120s).

  9. tomBEE December 22, 2015 / 9:42 pm

    Hi Ian,

    First of all, thanks so much for your sharing here! I have shortlisted 2 candidates for my xmas gift: either an a7s or a d750. which one would you recommend for astrophotography (initially some milky way with landscape, some bright deep sky such as m42 and later on, some fainter deep sky) at this point of time, please? Thanks a lot again and Merry Xmas!

  10. Gary December 22, 2015 / 2:30 pm

    Hey Ian. Thanks so much for all the information. When you are focusing on stars, do you use the EVF or LCD? I have been using the LCD but I think the EVF would actually be better. Thoughts?

  11. Tom Feldman December 20, 2015 / 9:50 am

    Ian, still trying to figure out what to get for my first camera on tight budget. The a6000 is super cheap right now, but the A7 is down to <$1000 on Amazon. For astrophotography as well as a good general use camera, does the a6000 win every time?

  12. Emily December 17, 2015 / 3:35 pm

    Hi Ian,

    Have you had experience with the Fuji 16mm 1.4 for astrophotography? Interested in hearing more about this lens quality and uses. Thanks!

    E

  13. Richard Colman December 9, 2015 / 11:20 am

    The Sigma 20mm F1.4 does not work too well for astrophoto, in my opinion. There is way too much COMA for full frame on an A7S. I bought one, and returned it. Reviews on lenstip.com also point out the coma problem. I had a similar situation with the Sigma 24mm.

    • Chris May 16, 2016 / 12:38 pm

      Me either. On sony a7s with mc-11…horrible. returnd it after a few days.

  14. Javier December 1, 2015 / 4:57 am

    Hi Ian, great post as usual. When I started to read lenses section I was completely sure I ´d find the Rokinon 24mm f1.4, because you always talk very well about this lens. So, now I wonder if in your opinion, any of those lenses are better than Rokinon (I know this lens is “old” at the moment).
    I would like to know your opinion because I going to give me for Xmas the Sony A7s. I´m a great fan of photographing the milky way, and the Rokinon was my target to attach to the A7s. I also want this camera to take deep sky objects with my telescope.

    And one more thing, because maybe I am not on the right track buying the Rokinon. I explain. I live in Gran Canaria (Canary Islands) and even if I drive far away from town, there is no place completely dark, so you ALWAYS have some light pollution. So, its necessary a lens so fast? Do you think Rokinon 14mm f2.8 can do a great job or its too much wide angle lens for a full frame?…… please, What lens would you use?

    Thanks for reading this loong post and for being a great communicator

    • Ian Norman December 2, 2015 / 10:14 am

      It is certainly not necessary to have an f/1.4 lens. Both the Rokinon 14mm and 24mm lenses are good choices and should work well. I usually suggest starting with a shorter lens because the wide field of view makes composition much easier.

  15. Jim Wilson November 29, 2015 / 12:21 pm

    Hello Ian,

    Have you checked out Ricoh GR for astro work? It has an infinity setting so no need to focus. Low noise sensor. Very sharp. Optical viewfinder for ease of framing. 28mm(e) or 21mm(e) view angle with adapter. The camera fits in your pocket but not the adapter. At f2.8 it could be faster but it has everything else.

    • Ian Norman November 29, 2015 / 5:22 pm

      I’ve been looking more and more seriously at the Ricoh GR just because it’s so pocketable. Even more so than the RX100 series given how thin the GR comes. I think it’s definitely one of those hidden gem cameras that may prove excellent. I did not realize that it had a wide angle adapter available too! I also love that the new GR II has Wifi capability as I find myself using it often with the RX100 III. I think it’s now time to take a closer look.

  16. max November 25, 2015 / 6:31 am

    Hi, Norman
    Could you give some advise about monitors and resolutions. At this moment I play with 1680X1050 and I am wondering is it make sense buy a new screen with higher resolution. My graphic card can work up to 2560×1600

    • max November 25, 2015 / 6:45 am

      I am sorry Ian I used your surname on the start.

    • Ian Norman November 25, 2015 / 4:50 pm

      Personally, this is actually something I have not looked into recently as I work exclusively on my Macbook Pro Retina at the moment.

      I personally wouldn’t suggest upgrading from 1680 to 2560 as the increase in resolution won’t be all that drastic. It might be worthwhile finding a graphics card that can handle UHD and I would probably start with something like the Dell IPS UHD monitors: P2715Q and P2415Q which are some affordable monitors that go all the way to 3840×2160. That said, I haven’t personally done all the research in this matter so take my suggestions with a grain of salt.

  17. Geoff November 25, 2015 / 4:40 am

    Hi Ian, Are you sure about your claim that the Nikon D750 is the only full frame DSLR to feature a tilt screen? I have a Sony a99 full frame DSLR which has been around for about 3 years and it features a tilt screen that is far superior to the Nikon screen. See DP Review links below. The LCD screen can tilt and rotate infinitely which is excellent when shooting the night sky. I highly recommend it, use it once and you are converted forever.
    http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sony-alpha-slt-a99
    http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sony-alpha-slt-a99/images/rearlcd.jpg

    • Ian Norman November 25, 2015 / 5:46 pm

      Hey Geoff! Good point. The a99, however, is a DSLT, so maybe I get a pass on this one? 😀

  18. Aaron November 24, 2015 / 2:24 am

    Great post Ian. Have you seen results of the sigma 20mm art? Your comment “It’s not absolutely perfect in terms of aberration and needs to be stopped down a little bit” has me worried ?

    • Ian Norman November 25, 2015 / 5:04 pm

      There are a few reviews out there like JM’s that seem to show a small amount of aberration in the extreme corners: link

      I haven’t tried one myself yet. But most of the reviews so far seem to indicate that it’s actually pretty damn good. I think a lot of people want it to perform like a Sigma 50mm/1.4 Art but I think people are forgetting just how bad most other fast 20mm lenses have been historically. Sigma’s old 20mm/1.8 had terrible aberrations by comparison. This new 20mm f/1.4 looks really good in my opinion, it’s just not perfect. It however, is probably the best full frame 20mm f/1.4 lens available as there are no others in existence. The closest lens that I can think of is the Leica Summilux 21mm f/1.4 but that lens costs more than my car and performs worse than this Sigma in regards to aberrations that affect stars. There was a sample test that I was going to refer to by Ron Scheffler that shows the Summilux 21mm in action but his blog seems to be down at the moment.

    • Steve December 2, 2015 / 9:38 am

      Ian – first of all, thanks for all your great content. The astro-bug bit me a couple of months ago, and now I’m a huge fan.

      I’ve got the Rokinon 14 f/2.8 for my Nikon FF (610, and now a 750) but I was looking at getting a sub-2.0 lens. What are your opinions on the Sigma 20mm f/1.4 (based on what you’ve seen) compared to a Rokinon 24mm f/1.4?

      Cheers!

    • Craig December 11, 2015 / 2:22 pm

      Honestly, it appears that the coma correction on the new Sigma 20mm is just average. I know we all wanted to believe the hype – but it seems Sigma is bound by the laws of physics just like everyone else (at least in this price range). Take a look at the review on lenstip.com for a good analysis. Also check out thedigitalpicture.com – while there is no specific review of the Sigma, he does have it in his lens comparison tool. The Rokinon (Samyang) is in there, too. When you compare the two side by side, it’s clear that the Sigma is much sharper overall. Sharper in the corners and MUCH sharper in the center. As pixel-peepers, we all get hung up on the corners and sometimes forget the rest of the image. In terms of value for the dollar, the Sigma is the clear winner. Easily worth the $350 premium over the Roki 24mm.

  19. Scott M November 23, 2015 / 4:29 pm

    There is now a cheaper ($26 instead of $80-100) USB-rechargeable headlamp with a red night-vision mode:
    link

    I can’t compare it to the more expensive models since I’ve never used them, but I think it works great.

    • Ian Norman November 25, 2015 / 5:17 pm

      Thanks for the share Scott!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *