Voigtländer 15mm f/4.5 Heliar III Astrophotography Review

Voigtlander 15mm Heliar III Astrophotography Review

I recently had the opportunity to shoot some astrophotography with an interesting lens: the Voigtlander 15mm f/4.5 Heliar III. With its rather modest/slow/dark f/4.5 aperture, the 15mm Heliar III isn’t the most obvious choice for shooting the night sky, but in reality it actually performed well, especially when paired with the Sony a7II. This review is as much a test of the lens as it is an experiment shooting the Milky Way with a slow lens. Read on for more about my experience shooting the night sky with the Voigtländer 15mm f/4.5 Heliar III.

Introduction

The Voigtlander 15mm f/4.5 Heliar III is a unique lens that’s made for M mount cameras like the digital Leica M, but it’s also easily adaptable to other mirrorless cameras. It’s notable as one of the widest-angle lenses available for digital full frame mirrorless cameras and rangefinders. It has a super wide 110 degree field of view on a full frame sensor — perfect for shooting wide sweeping landscapes. I recently published my complete real-world review of the Voigtländer 15mm f/4.5 Heliar III lens over on The Photon Collective with details about the intricacies of the lens, quirks of use and lots sample photos (especially landscapes and adventure photography). This astrophotography review is intended as an extension of that review. You can open the full review on Photon Collective by clicking the image below:

voigtlander-15mm-heliar-iii-review-photon

I spent several weeks shooting the deserts of California, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas as part of our road trip across the American Southwest. You can get updates on our progress at North to South. I have had the Voigtländer 15mm Heliar III mounted to my Sony a7II via the Hawks Factory Leica M to Sony E Mount Adapter V5 for the entire road trip so far. I’ve found it a joy to use. The build quality of the 15mm Heliar III is top notch: it’s compact but well made and still feels substantial and well balanced on the a7II.

voigtlander-15mm-heliar-iii-review-1

During my time with the lens, I, of course, used it a bunch at night for shooting the night sky. I initially figured that f/4.5 was a little bit slow for landscape astrophotography, but the 15mm Heliar III performed admirably, particularly paired with the full frame sensor on the a7II. All told, it’s about optically equivalent to a comparable 10mm/2.8 lens for an APS-C camera in terms of total light gathering power. With its relatively slow f/4.5 rating, making photos with a typical Milky Way exposure setting will usually result in a little bit more relative noise than if you were using a more appropriate lens.

voigtlander-15mm-heliar-iii-review-2

As you probably already know, I like pushing photography gear to its limits, and the 15mm f/4.5 Heliar III seemed like a prime candidate to do the last thing most people would think of doing with such a slow lens: low-light shooting. I had two distinct opportunities to use the lens for shooting the Milky Way: The first was a brief session at Valley of Fire State Park in Nevada with only a short window of time between the rise of the Milky Way and moonrise.

voigtlander-15mm-heliar-iii-astrophotography-review-4

Night Photography with Patrick from Switzerland, Valley of Fire, NV. Voigtländer 15mm f/4.5 Heliar III, a7II, f/4.5, 30s, ISO 6400, Full Resolution (30.5MB)

The second opportunity was during a backcountry backpacking trip at White Sands National Monument in New Mexico, the same place where I made the photos for my recent smartphone astrophotography article. Both desert locales offered very different conditions. Valley of Fire was very warm at night with hazy clouds and lots of light pollution from Las Vegas, while White Sands was cool and damp from a recent rainstorm with very dark skies but lots of light pollution being reflected off of thick, fast moving clouds. The 15mm Heliar III did much better than I expected for an f/4.5 lens, in large part, I’m sure, due to the excellent sensor on the Sony a7II.

voigtlander-15mm-heliar-iii-review--29

Photographing the Milky Way with a Smartphone, White Sands National Monument, NM. Voigtländer Heliar 15mm/4.5, a7II, f/4.5, 30s, ISO 1600, Full Resolution (30MB)

All of the sample images on this review were made on the Sony a7II and processed in Adobe Lightroom 5.7.1 and/or Adobe Photoshop CS6. The full resolution images are downloadable via the caption links.

Now let’s talk about the shooting experience with the Voigtländer 15mm f/4.5 Heliar III:

Shooting Slow

I’ll be honest and say that a faster ultra wide angle lens like the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 (full review) is better suited to astrophotography over the Voigtländer 15mm/4.5 Heliar III. A faster lens (lower f/number) will always allow the camera to collect more light and produce a less noisy image. I talk about this in more detail on my ‘how to pick a lens’ article. That said, the 15mm Heliar III also comes with the advantage of being significantly smaller, lighter, sharper, better built and easier to use than the cheaper Rokinon 14mm and many other comparable full frame ultra wide angle lenses. If you’re willing to compromise a little bit of lens brightness for the other benefits that the Heliar III presents, its performance is actually quite good at night with the right technique.

voigtlander-15mm-heliar-iii-review--31

The Milky Way at White Sands National Monument, NM. Voigtländer Heliar 15mm/4.5, a7II, f/4.5, 30s, ISO 1600, Full Resolution (27.4MB)

Right from the starting gate, it should be expected that shooting untracked landscape astrophotography with an f/4.5 lens will tend to produce noisy results. Shooting with the 15mm Heliar III is no exception, but there’s a trait that helps the lens out: field of view. The 15mm Heliar III has an ultra wide field of view of about 110°. That’s really wide. Wide enough that the slow motion of the stars across the sky (from Earth’s rotation) won’t be very apparent relative to the total field of view. Basically, the extra field of view makes it possible to use very long exposure times — in excess of 30 seconds if needed — in order to gather more light. Being able to use these extra long shutter times helps compensate for the lens’s relatively small aperture. In general, the longer we can expose the image, the more light the sensor can collect and the less apparent noise there will be in the image.

voigtlander-15mm-heliar-iii-astrophotography-review-2

The Milky Way at White Sands National Monument, NM. Voigtländer Heliar 15mm/4.5, a7II, f/4.5, 30s, ISO 1600, Full Resolution (20.4MB)

I found that shooting at f/4.5 with a 30 second shutter time collected adequate amounts of light without showing too much star trailing at normal viewing distances. WIth a 30 second exposure time on the a7II’s very high resolution 24 megapixel sensor, there’s definitely some noticeable streaking of the stars when viewing the photos at 100% magnification, but it’s not apparent when you’re looking at the photo as a whole. I tended to keep my ISO at a moderate 1600 for most of my shots, which provided a good balance of brightness and dynamic range.

voigtlander-15mm-heliar-iii-astrophotography-review-1

The Milky Way at White Sands National Monument, NM. Voigtländer Heliar 15mm/4.5, a7II, f/4.5, 30s, ISO 1600, Full Resolution (26MB)

At the time of this writing, there are only a select few full frame digital cameras that this lens is really suitable for: the Sony a7, a7S, a7R, a7II and the various digital Leica M cameras. You can also adapt it to various APS-C and Micro 4/3 mirrorless cameras, but there are more appropriate (and typically faster) lenses for those cropped sensor cameras that offer a similar focal length (e.g the Sony E 10-18mm/4, Fujifilm 14mm f/2.8, and the Leica 15mm f/1.7, etc.).

While I don’t yet have any experience with a digital Leica, I can at least attest to the quality of the Sony sensors, having used most of the variations of their Exmor sensor. Where these sensors really show their strengths is in situations like this (low light conditions with a slow lens). The amount of shadow detail still visible in even the darkest parts of the image is just amazing. Since the 15mm Heliar is so slow, what I initially thought would be a brief experiment that would keep me from ever again using slow lenses for astrophotography ended up becoming a testament to how great modern digital sensors really are.

voigtlander-15mm-heliar-iii-review--32

Our Camp and the Milky Way at White Sands National Monument, NM. Voigtländer Heliar 15mm/4.5, a7II, f/4.5, 30s, ISO 1600, Full Resolution (26.7MB)

One of the biggest positive traits of this lens is that it shows almost no detrimental aberrations in the corners of the image while shooting the stars. Coma and astigmatism seem well controlled and the stars keep their pinpoint shape at normal viewing distances. If you look really really close, there’s perhaps a small amount of tangential astigmatism in the very corner at f/4.5 (look at the bright star Altair in top left corner of the image below), but it’s downright minimal. Almost no apparent aberrations indicates that the lens was very well designed and is likely an explanation for why the lens is so sharp.

voigtlander-15mm-heliar-iii-review--30

Our Camp at White Sands National Monument, NM. Voigtländer Heliar 15mm/4.5, a7II, f/4.5, 8x30s Stack, ISO 1600, Full Resolution (20.9MB)

One of the best benefits of using the lens on the a7II with the helicoid adapter is the ability to calibrate the infinity focus stop for critical focus. This capability makes night sky focusing as easy as just turning the lens to infinity. No need for scrutinizing the focus on the LCD — just set it and forget it. This benefit alone is a very desirable trait for photographing the Milky Way, and a consideration for choosing an adapted manual lens like the Voigtländers. If you’re mounting any M mount lens on your Sony E mount camera, get the Hawks Helicoid V5 Adapter, too, if only for the ability to calibrate the infinity stop. It makes the experience with the lens excellent.

voigtlander-15mm-heliar-iii-review--27

The Milky Way at Valley of Fire, NV. Voigtländer Heliar 15mm/4.5, a7II, f/4.5, 30s, ISO 6400, Full Resolution (30.3MB)

Conclusions

Overall, my experience shooting astrophotos with the Voigtländer 15mm f/4.5 Heliar III exceeded my expectations. It’s rather sharp and shows very few aberrations. It’s not the brightest lens around, but its excellent build quality, excellent image quality and compact size seem to outweigh the shortcomings it has in the speed department.

voigtlander-15mm-heliar-iii-astrophotography-review-3

Our Tent at White Sands National Monument, NM. Voigtländer Heliar 15mm/4.5, a7II, f/4.5, 30s, ISO 800, Full Resolution (13.4MB)

The lens’s extra wide field of view makes it possible to easily use a 30+ second long exposure without too much star trailing. Being able to use these extra long exposures helps compensate for the smaller aperture, and as a result the lens manages to produce some decent astrophotos, particularly when paired with a camera like the Sony a7II. The lens trades a little brightness for more portability, excellent ergonomics, and excellent image quality. It would be a fine choice for a compact ultra wide angle lens on any of Sony’s or Leica’s full frame digital cameras. As a result, I can actually highly recommend this lens for daytime shooting and astrophotography alike, a conclusion I did not expect.

Verdict:
HIGHLY RECOMMENDED

Where to Buy

I personally buy almost all of my equipment through B&H and without them, this review would not have been possible. They’re one of the most reputable online retailers, they have an excellent return policy and are guaranteed to have the lowest prices anywhere online. If you are considering buying the 15mm Heliar III or any camera equipment for that matter, consider buying through the affiliate links on this page. You won’t pay anything extra but Lonely Speck will receive a small commission (usually 2-4%) to help run the website. Here are the links for the equipment used in this article:

Learn Astrophotography

Astrophotography 101 is completely free for everyone. All of the lessons will be available on the Lonely Speck Astrophotography 101 page for you to access at any time. Enter your email and whenever we post a new lesson you’ll receive it in your inbox. We won’t spam you and your email will stay secure. Furthermore, updates will be sent out only periodically, usually less than once per week.

Join 7 282 other subscribers.

Help us help you!

Believe it or not, Lonely Speck is a full-time job. It’s been an amazing experience for us to see a community develop around learning astrophotography and we’re so happy to be a small part of it. I have learned that amazing things happen when you ask for help so remember that we are always here for you. If you have any questions about photography or just want to share a story, contact us! If you find the articles here helpful, consider helping us out with a donation.

Donate

Once again, the biggest contribution comes from the use of our affiliate links. When you buy through the links on Lonely Speck, it costs you nothing extra, but we will receive a small commission (usually 2-4%) to help run the site.

Thanks so much for being a part of our astrophotography adventure.

-Ian

lonely-speck-logo-icon-16px



Ian Norman

Creator at Lonely Speck
Ian Norman, co-founder and creator of The Photon Collective and Lonely Speck. Ian is a full time traveler, photographer and entrepreneur. In February 2013, he called it quits on his 9-to-5 to pursue a lifestyle of photography. Follow Ian's photography adventures on Instagram.

41 Responses

  1. Arno April 19, 2016 / 11:56 pm

    Hey Ian,

    thx for that great review. I do also wait for my e-mount Version for the A7ii and I am looking forward to test it out.

    • Ian Norman April 20, 2016 / 2:41 am

      I think the e mount one should be great. I really look forward to trying out it too, perhaps the 10mm f/5.6 version as well. I can’t wait to see how wide that field of view looks on full-frame. I think that the ability to have aperture data and lens EXIF information will be very valuable.

  2. Salvatore Raciti March 21, 2016 / 11:47 pm

    Hello Ian, Thank you for your detailed reviews and for sharing your techniques. I especially liked your comment (in the video) about maxing the saturation to establish white balance. (Great insight!) I am waiting for my Voightländer 15mm in native E-mount for use on my A7R2 — and wondering if the issue of noise might be mitigated with the improved performance of the back-lit sensor?

    • Ian Norman April 20, 2016 / 2:44 am

      I do think that the a7RII has a huge advantage over the a7II that I used in terms of its sensor performance with dark subjects. I would have no hesitation using the 15/4.5 Heliar III on the a7RII for astrophotography.

  3. Keith August 19, 2015 / 10:40 am

    Thanks for the review, Ian. I’m inspired to try the Voigt. 15 compared to my huge Vivitar 13 and LAEA4. Losing that weight will be a lot easier than eating right and exercising!

  4. Ed Genaux July 18, 2015 / 1:35 pm

    What about the Voigtlander 12 mm f/5.6 with the A7s you could leave the shutter open for 41.6 sec allowing for a super low ISO! Just a thought, and would love to see those images.

    • Ian Norman July 18, 2015 / 4:56 pm

      So there are two main things that hinder the 12mm/5.6: the lens was made for film rangefinders and its optical design isn’t super friendly with digital sensors. It ends up with really dark smeared corners and color shifts when used on a camera like the a7S.

      Secondly, the f/5.6 aperture is really starting to become too small and the result will start to be more noise in the final images. It would work, but I would rather have something with a lower f/number. This 15mm/4.5 is already starting to push the limits of acceptable noise, in my opinion.

      One option for a faster 12mm is the Sony E 10-18mm/4. It actually works on full frame if used between 12mm and 16mm and has the f/4 aperture so it’s a full stop faster than the Voigtlander.

      Additionally, there’s the Canon 11-24mm/4L and the Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6, both of which are faster than the Voigtlander by a bit but are much larger and heavier but they’re worth mentioning.

  5. Ash July 16, 2015 / 8:15 am

    Hey Ian, great review. I am planning to buy a lens for astrophotography (camera: Sony a7ii) so what would be your advice between samyang/rokinon 14mm f2.8 and voightlander 15mm f4?

    • Ian Norman July 18, 2015 / 5:03 pm

      Hey Ash, If your budget can fit it in, I would probably go for the Voightländer and the same Hawks adapter that I used in this review. I’m likely going to end up buying this lens eventually (the one reviewed here was loaned to me) because I had such a good time using it. It’s truly one of the best ultra-wide angle lenses I’ve ever used and a perfect option when paired with the a7II.

      If you have the big bucks, go for the Sony Zeiss 16-35mm/4 OSS. It’s a third stop faster than the Voigtlander, has autofocus, etc. but also is much larger.

      I think the Rokinon 14mm/2.8 is a fine lens but it’s way too big for the a7II in my honest opinion.

  6. PhinioxGlade June 10, 2015 / 5:58 am

    I’m a Sony A7/Ii shooter. Last year I shoot the Milky Way a lot for a 365 challenge because it was just so darn easy. All of my work was done at f4-4.5, mainly due to speed limitation of my glass. With further light loss via the LA-EA4 adapter. Even at these speeds I found as you found that the Sony full frame sensors work great.

    I was particularly happy with the Sony A7 Zeiss FE 16-35mm f4 OSS combo:
    https://goo.gl/photos/LSgiZbrGr7TrS76i7

    Any way I have come to the conclusion that the A7 has slightly better high ISO performance than the A7ii when shooting RAW. I’m extremely familiar with the A7 taking 65000 photos last year on that camera, less so with my A7ii. Have you noticed?

    • Ian Norman June 11, 2015 / 2:27 pm

      Thanks for sharing, looks like the 16-35mm/4 is a lens I would definitely like to try! I haven’t noticed a significant difference between the a7II and a7.

  7. Don June 9, 2015 / 1:05 pm

    Since everyone is throwing their hat in with their preferred lens review, I’m curious if you’ll be taking a look at Fuji’s new 16mm f/1.4. I’ve heard accusations of coma problems, but not sure how seriously to take them.

    Thanks as always,

    Don

    • Ian Norman June 11, 2015 / 2:29 pm

      I have not personally used it yet. I too have seen a lot of images that show pronounced sagittal astigmatism when shooting at f/1.4. It seems to clean up by f/2 but for the price I would have hoped for better.

  8. Khris Ng June 9, 2015 / 12:45 am

    Hi

    Another great review Ian. I was wondering though, when or what time did you took the photo with the sunset (4th or 5th of the photo)? Did you use the ETTR technique to capture the high light pollution of the sunset ?

    Thanks so much !

    Cheers,
    Khris

    • Ian Norman June 9, 2015 / 8:32 am

      So all of these photos were made after midnight and the orange glow you see is actually the light pollution from El Paso Texas. Even with the light pollution, it was still very dark so ETTR was not necessary.

  9. Bill June 8, 2015 / 2:30 pm

    Ian,

    Thanks for the great reviews, as always. Have you had a go with the Voigtlander 21mm f/1.8 Ultron on the A7S? I apologize if you did and I missed it.

    Thanks, Bill

    • Ian Norman June 9, 2015 / 9:14 am

      I definitely want to review the Ultron 21/1.8 eventually! I’ve seen examples from it that seem to indicate that it should have good night performance so I’m excitedntonsee how it is, especially in comparison to the Nikon 20mm/1.8G

    • Tina Warlick December 17, 2015 / 5:50 pm

      I use the Voightlander 21 mm f/1.8 Ultron on the Sony A7. Good build on the lens. Hard infinity which is nice. Sharp center with slight coma on corners.

  10. Cory June 3, 2015 / 12:00 pm

    Hey Ian,

    Great stuff and you have inspired me to throw my hat into the ring of photogs who hang out at night in the middle of the dark.. ha ha ha.

    Question, can you weigh into the rule of 500 or 600, why are there two? Which or why do you choose one over the other, or is it just trial and error to find the settings you like… just wanted to hear your take.

    Cheers,
    Cory

    • Ian Norman June 5, 2015 / 1:34 pm

      500 rule, 600 rule, honestly it doesn’t matter which one you use. They’re honestly just guidelines for figuring out what works best. With these rules, there are many unaccounted for variables that affect how much star trailing you’ll actually get: where you’re pointing the lens in the sky, the resolution of your sensor and your own personal threshold for accepting star trails. I usually don’t mind a little bit of trailing at 100% magnification as long as it’s not visible in at normal viewing distances.

      So the 500/600 rules are mostly just guidelines. Definitely experiment a little bit with your equipment. You’ll start to develop your own standards for shutter times. For example, with a 28mm lens, I always default to 15 seconds. With a 24mm, it’s always 20 seconds. Both of these examples are pretty close to what you’d get suggested by the “500 rule” so that’s what I typically recommend for most photographers to use when calculating their shutter time.

    • Cory June 5, 2015 / 1:51 pm

      Thanks Ian, that’s what I thought. I will be using a Sony A6000 with the Rokinin 12mm. so on my APS-C sensor I will be at 18mm which should be good. Excited to go out and see what I can come back with…

  11. Stan June 2, 2015 / 12:53 pm

    Amazing review as usual Ian! This may be off the subject but have you tested the Sony 28mm f2.0 on the A7s yet? Man! I’m on the fence about getting it. I hear it’s quite sharp! Any thoughts?

    Thanks again!

    • Ian Norman June 2, 2015 / 11:14 pm

      I will literally get the 28mm/2 today for testing and review! All indications seem that its excellent but with high distortion.

    • Liam Nethery June 2, 2015 / 11:59 pm

      I have been using the Sony 28mm f2 for astrophotography for a few weeks now and it is brilliant. Very sharp, even wide open at f2 and almost no coma or chromatic aberration. I made an edit tutorial (inspired by Ian Norman) on a shot taken with the 28mm f2 at http://www.youtube.com/liamnetheryfilms and some sample photos taken with it are on my website at http://www.liamnethery.com/astrophotography.
      I can’t wait to see what Ian has to say about it, and I personally think it is an excellent lens, highly recommended!

    • Ian Norman June 3, 2015 / 9:37 am

      Some awesome shots Liam! I can’t wait to try out this lens!

    • Jordan June 3, 2015 / 11:20 am

      If you are able to add the WA adapter (and/or fisheye) to your 28mm F2 review, I know it’s something some of us landscapers are considering!

    • Stan June 3, 2015 / 11:34 pm

      Thanks Ian! I can’t wait to see what you come up with and thank you Liam that helped out tons!!! I do have the A7s and the Sony Zeiss 16-35mm f4 and it works great! But man it’s really a big lens and kind of defeats the purpose of having the A7. I also have the Rokinon 14mm f2.8 thanks to Ian Thumbs up!!! So in my mind I already have a wide lens I was thinking of getting something faster but in that 20-28mm field. Thanks again guys!

  12. Albert Dros June 2, 2015 / 8:35 am

    Nice review Ian. I am wondering though, why are you not using the A7s for this review? I could imagine this is a killer lens for the A7s! You usually use the A7II now? I like it though, as I own the A7II myself, so this review is absolutely perfect for me. Though, I will still wondering, why no A7s samples :) ?

    • Ian Norman June 2, 2015 / 8:48 am

      I’m working on an a7II and RX100M3 review now so that’s what I’m shooting with! I agree that the a7S should be able to handle this lens very well, I just didn’t bring an a7S with me on my road trip…

  13. Samuel Kováčik June 1, 2015 / 1:53 pm

    Hi!

    For the first link “Where to buy” is not working, perhaps there’s a typo somewhere.

  14. Yoon May 31, 2015 / 8:12 am

    Nice post, it seems like distortion is well controlled even at 15mm wide. I am looking forward to see more reviews with sigma 24mm art!!

    • Ian Norman June 1, 2015 / 2:40 pm

      Thank you Yoon! The distortion is indeed minimal on the lens. I’ll be trying to definitely get to review the Sigma 24mm this summer.

      Ian

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *