Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Astrophotography Review

canon-ef-50mm-f18-stm-lens-review-title

There’s a new nifty 50 in town. In this short review we test out the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM, Canon’s latest iteration of their affordable 50mm lens. At about $125, it’s the cheapest Canon prime lens available, making it an attractive addition to any Canon kit. Let’s see how it does with astrophotography.

Introduction

The Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM is Canon’s newest most affordable prime lens. At 50mm, it’s considered a “standard” lens: not wide and not narrow, providing a relatively natural 46 degree field of view when used on a full frame camera. It features a fast f/1.8 aperture which makes it attractive for shooting in low-light conditions. We tested the lens for a couple of weeks, shooting on a few clear-ish nights in Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming and Waterton Lakes National Park in Alberta, Canada.

canon-ef-50mm-f18-stm-lens-review-2

The Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM lens is also the first lens we tested using our newly developed aberration test method. Let’s review some quick specs and see how the lens performed.

Specifications

  • Full Name: Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM
  • Mounts to: Canon EF, EF-S
  • Angle of View (Full Frame): 46 Degrees, Standard
  • Angle of View (APS-C, 1.6x, 80mm equiv.): 32 Degrees, Medium Telephoto
  • Diaphragm Blades: 7, Curved
  • Aperture Range: f/1.8-f/22
  • Minimum Focus Distance and Magnification: 14 in (35.5 cm), 0.21x
  • Elements/Groups: 6/5
  • Focus: AF/MF
  • Filter Thread Diameter 49mm
  • Diameter: 2.7in/69mm
  • Length: 1.6in/41mm
  • Weight: 5.7oz/162g
  • Image Stabilization: No
  • Notes: No Distance Scale, Stepper Motor Autofocus, Lens Hood ES-68

Initial Impressions

The Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM is compatible with all Canon EOS DSLRs with the EF and EF-S mount. It’s a very small and lightweight lens, making for a comfortable walk around kit with a standard field of view. I really like the 50mm focal length for “everyday” photography. It’s narrow enough to force you to compose but wide enough to still use it practically for capturing a scene. It’s a focal length that requires a little more care to use effectively, and I think that’s the reason that a 50mm is so often recommended as a must-have lens for any serious photographer’s kit.

canon-ef-50mm-f18-stm-lens-review-3

Comparing the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM with the EF 50mm f/1.8 II

This latest iteration of the lens is much improved in mechanical quality over its predecessor, the EF 50mm f/1.8 II. The new EF 50mm f/1.8 STM features a metallic mount, much preferable over the older plastic mount. The lens barrel is all plastic which keeps the lens very lightweight but still gives it a high quality feel. The optical design seems very similar with 6 elements in 5 groups. There is no mention of the use of any aspherical elements, so this seems to be a re-hash of their older design. The lens does feature an updated aperture diaphragm with 7 curved blades that should keep out of focus highlights (bokeh) looking round at intermediate apertures (which is more desirable than the pentagon-shaped bokeh that the old lens produces). The 7-bladed aperture will produce 14-pointed star bursts on point light sources when stopped down to a high f/number.

canon-ef-50mm-f18-stm-lens-review-1

Focusing with the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM

The lens uses Canon’s new STM stepper motor focusing system which is much quieter and faster than the old gear drive focusing system (but still not quite as silent as Canon’s USM ultrasonic motor focusing).

The lens features a simple AF/MF switch to flip between autofocus and manual focus modes. The lens is focus-by-wire but feels very fast and linear, making manual focusing very easy and autofocus very quick. The lens does not feature internal focusing and instead uses a dated rack focus that moves all of the lens elements forward and backward when focusing.

This is a barebones, budget friendly 50mm.

The lens does not feature any kind of distance scale to indicate focus position. It features a 49mm filter thread and a bayonet for the accessory ES-68 lens hoodThis is a barebones, budget friendly 50mm. Other than the stepper motor focusing and the increase in aperture blades, there’s nothing particularly new or revolutionary about the 50mm STM. It’s a simple photographic tool that fits its affordable price point.

Performance and Image Quality

As Canon’s cheapest prime lens, the EF 50mm f/1.8 STM is not Canon’s sharpest lens.

We expected this going into the review but still wanted to see what could be done using such a cheap lens, especially in the context of astrophotography. For most general daytime shooting, I would recommend this lens in a heartbeat. For the price, it’s a wonderful portrait shooter and is capable of very sharp photos from about f/2.8 and higher.

Finding the Best f/number

The attractive thing about the 50mm f/1.8 STM is its ability to shoot wide open at f/1.8.

The very low f/number allows the lens to capture more light in dark situations for cleaner final images than if a higher f/number was used. Low f/numbers also allow for narrower depth of field, an attractive trait of most portrait lenses. Therefore, the 50mm f/1.8 STM works excellently for portraits.

Most fast aperture lenses compromise some sharpness in order to achieve low f/numbers, and the Canon 50mm f/1.8 is, unfortunately, no exception. At f/1.8, the lens shows considerable aberration and slightly reduced contrast. The corners are not particularly sharp at f/1.8.

canon-ef-50mm-f18-stm-astigmatism-stars-coma-full-frame

The stars shot at f/1.8 on the EF 50mm f/1.8 STM (see 100% crop below)

For astrophotography, I would not recommend using the Canon 50mm f/1.8 STM at its wide open setting of f/1.8, as it greatly distorts stars at this setting, especially in the corners of the full frame. Upon stopping down one and a third stops to f/2.8, the lens sharpness increases considerably across the frame and the performance for star photography is much improved. I think f/2.8 is the 50mm STM’s sweet spot where it has the best balance of light gathering and sharpness. The aberrations in the extreme corners of the full frame image never really go away at f/2.8, but these imperfections are small enough to not be distracting.

Normally I’d say it’s disappointing that the lens produces so much aberration wide open, but at such a low price it’s hard to complain too much.

canon-ef-50mm-f18-stm-astigmatism-stars-coma

The 50mm focal length is a little narrow for capturing the Milky Way, so the lens’s best use is for capturing narrower crops of detailed sections of the sky, perhaps using multiple frames for producing a stacked image or even a panorama stitch for a wide angle field of view.

Aberration Characteristics of the Canon 50mm f/1.8 STM

In order to fully characterize the aberration performance of the Canon 50mm f/1.8 STM, we performed a simple test that I developed that shows the shape of the aberration at several f/number stops. This shows how the lens improves as it is stopped down. The test is performed on both full frame and APS-C frames. We tested the 50mm STM at f/1.8, f/2 and f/2.8. If you would like to read more about lens aberrations and see a more detailed explanation of our test, check out our Practical Guide to Lens Aberrations.

Canon-EF-50mm-f18-STM-lens-aberration-test-aps-c-lonelyspeck

Canon-EF-50mm-f18-STM-lens-aberration-test-full-frame-sim-lonelyspeck

At f/1.8, the Canon 50mm f/1.8 STM shows noticeable coma at the edges of the APS-C frame, and the aberration transitions into a mix of strong sagittal astigmatism and coma by the corner of the full frame.

Canon-EF-50mm-f18-STM-lens-aberration-test-lonelyspeck-wide-open

Stopping down to f/2 doesn’t show a huge improvement but the size of the aberrations is slightly reduced at this setting. Canon-EF-50mm-f18-STM-lens-aberration-test-lonelyspeck-f2

It’s only upon stopping down to about f/2.8 that the size of the aberration starts to reach very good levels of about 0.5% of the frame height. Canon-EF-50mm-f18-STM-lens-aberration-test-lonelyspeck-f28

Aberration Shape Key

aberrations-key

Real World Astro Images with the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM

We got our Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM from B&H as a loaner for this review. The lens followed us on our road trip across the central western region of the United States and Canada.  I had the opportunity to use the lens for astrophotography while camping in Yellowstone National Park and Waterton Lakes National Park.

Our first night in Yellowstone proved to be exceptionally cloudy with no visible galactic center so I worked within a short window of time to shoot the region of the constellation Cygnus which was almost perfectly overhead at the time. There was still a lot of moisture in the sky so the results had a considerable amount of haze in the image, but I rather liked the way it accentuated the colors of the bright stars. I managed to shoot a series of about 15 photos before the clouds moved in to fully obscure my view of the night sky. I combined these photos together using my typical LRGB and stacking method to produce this final image:

canon-50mm-f18-stm-astrophotography-review-3

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM, Stacked 15 x 6s, f/2.8, ISO 6400

You can see the bright star Deneb just left of the center of the frame, and just below it is the pinkish-colored North American Nebula. Overall, I felt pretty happy with the performance of the lens stopped down to f/2.8.

My next opportunity to shoot was several days later, and this time I had a clearer view of the galactic center, albeit with some light pollution from a partially lit moon. At dusk, we stopped by Yellowstone Falls, and I made a quick panorama stitch to capture the Grand Canyon of the Yellowstone with the moon directly over the falls.

Grand Canyon of the Yellowstone panorama stitch in the moonlight with the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM

As the moon approached the horizon and the sky grew darker, I wanted to see how well I could pick up the fine details and dust lanes visible around the galactic center. I shot a sequence of about 24 photos and stacked them for noise reduction. There was still an ample amount of light pollution from the moon in addition to (what I didn’t know at the time) the aurora borealis, so this image required some color correction to compensate for the bluish purple hue of the image straight out of the camera.

canon-50mm-f18-stm-astrophotography-review-2

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM, Stacked 25 x 6s, f/3.2, ISO 1600

Stopped down to f/3.2, the lens did a great job at capturing the fine details of the galactic center, and most of the stars look like nice pinpoints.

We were just about to pack up for the night and go to sleep when I noticed a faint glow on the horizon. Skeptical of what I saw, we pulled the car over on the side of the road along the Yellowstone River in Hayden Valley. Sure enough, my thoughts were confirmed when I was able to capture the green and purple glow of the aurora borealis. Most of my images of the aurora were made on a wider angle lens, but I did take the opportunity to capture the image below with a quick two frame panorama stitch: 

canon-50mm-f18-stm-astrophotography-review-4

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM, Panorama 2 x 10s, f/2.8, ISO 1600

Later in the week, we traveled north to Waterton Lakes National Park in Alberta, Canada. The moon was in its late phase, so I had to wait until after midnight for it to start setting in order to capture the galactic center. Below is a great example of the narrow view that a 50mm lens provides of the night sky. It’s possible to just fit the galactic center in the frame, but compared to my typical landscape astrophotos, it still looks rather cropped in appearance.

canon-50mm-f18-stm-astrophotography-review-6

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM, 8s, f/2.8, ISO 1600

Using the 50mm to shoot a wide angle stitched panorama is one of my favorite techniques for capturing the Milky Way, and the 50mm f/1.8 STM proved to be a great lens for doing just that.

canon-50mm-f18-stm-astrophotography-review-5

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM, Panorama 20 x 8s, f/2.8, ISO 1600

For the final photograph of the night at Waterton Lakes, I pulled my focus onto Diana as she stared out at the serene scene for a final panorama stitch.

canon-50mm-f18-stm-astrophotography-review-7

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM, Panorama 25 x 8s, f/2.8, ISO 1600

Conclusions and Recommendation

The Canon 50mm f/1.8 STM isn’t a spectacular performing f/1.8 lens, but it is very good at f/2.8 and higher f/numbers.

For about $125, it’s a very useful and affordable astrophotography tool, particularly for panorama stitching. I would expect substantially better performance from other 50mm-ish lenses like the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art or the Sony Zeiss 55mm f/1.8, but these lenses are substantially more expensive than the small Canon 50mm f/1.8 STM. Compared to the older Canon 50mm f/1.8 II, it seems almost identical optically but offers improved build, autofocus and a better aperture diaphragm while still being offered at nearly the same price. I expect this lens to be one of Canon’s best selling lenses for a long time.

Biggest Pros:

  • Very affordable
  • Very sharp at f/2.8 and higher
  • Small, light, quiet

Biggest Cons:

  • Mediocre aberration performance at f/1.8
  • Extends when focusing
  • Still noisier than USM lenses

Verdict:
RECOMMENDED (3.5/5)

There’s nothing else in the 50mm range that’s available this cheap Canon’s current lineup, so it’s a great option if you’re on a budget. It’s not perfect optically but stop it down to f/2.8 and it still manages to perform well while providing ample light gathering for night sky shooting. For just over a hundred bucks, I’ll take it. Recommended for beginners on a budget that especially want to try out panorama stitching of the Milky Way.

Where to Buy

I personally buy almost all of my equipment through B&H and without them, this review would not have been possible. They’re one of the most reputable online retailers, they have an excellent return policy and are guaranteed to have the lowest prices anywhere online. If you are considering buying the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM, or any camera equipment for that matter, consider buying through the affiliate links on this page. You won’t pay anything extra but Lonely Speck will receive a small commission (usually 2-4%) to help run the website. Here are the links for the equipment used in this article:

Learn Astrophotography

Astrophotography 101 is completely free for everyone. All of the lessons will be available on the Lonely Speck Astrophotography 101 page for you to access at any time. Enter your email and whenever we post a new lesson you’ll receive it in your inbox. We won’t spam you and your email will stay secure. Furthermore, updates will be sent out only periodically, usually less than once per week.

Join 6 772 other subscribers.

Help us help you!

Believe it or not, Lonely Speck is a full-time job. It’s been an amazing experience for us to see a community develop around learning astrophotography and we’re so happy to be a small part of it. I have learned that amazing things happen when you ask for help so remember that we are always here for you. If you have any questions about photography or just want to share a story, contact us! If you find the articles here helpful, consider helping us out with a donation.

Donate

Once again, the biggest contribution comes from the use of our affiliate links. When you buy through the links on Lonely Speck, it costs you nothing extra, but we will receive a small commission (usually 2-4%) to help run the site.

Thanks so much for being a part of our astrophotography adventure.

-Ian

lonely-speck-logo-icon-16px



Ian Norman

Creator at Lonely Speck
Ian Norman, co-founder and creator of The Photon Collective and Lonely Speck. Ian is a full time traveler, photographer and entrepreneur. In February 2013, he called it quits on his 9-to-5 to pursue a lifestyle of photography. Follow Ian's photography adventures on Instagram.

19 Responses

  1. Patrick March 14, 2016 / 3:56 pm

    If the 50mm f/1.8 isn’t sharp until f/2.8, I wonder if the similarly affordable 24mm f/2.8 STM “pancake” could be used with similar results?

  2. Alyn Wallace February 28, 2016 / 3:25 am

    Hey Ian,

    Great review as always. I was wondering if you have tried the Samyang/Rokinon 50mm f/1.4 offering? And if so how it compares to this? There seems to be a lack of reviews for it online and those that do exist don’t test it out for astro.

  3. Carlos February 8, 2016 / 8:59 pm

    What’s your opinion on using a canon 50mm f/1.4 for astrophotography or would you rather use a canon 50mm f/1.8?

  4. Umang Sharma December 2, 2015 / 5:18 am

    Ian norman.. Greetings from India
    I am an absolute beginner and currently using a Canon 600D, and i have made up my mind to buy the 50mm f1.8 stm after reading the review. Initially i wanted to buy this lens for the streetportrait photography.. And now idon’t have to buy a separate costly lens gor astrophotography.

    My query basically revolves around stitching and stacking.
    And secondly most important.. I wanted to know how do i focus a foreground subject.. Just like the picture of diana looking at the milky way..
    Thanx.

    • Ian Norman December 2, 2015 / 9:06 am

      If you prefer focus on a foreground subject, it helps to use a torch to illuminate the subject initially while focusing.

  5. Richard Colman November 4, 2015 / 11:36 pm

    i put a Canon 50mm F/1.8 II on a Sony A7S using a Fotodiox adapter. Although this combinateion does not seem to autofocus, manual focus is fine. However, taking some test
    shots in light pollluted south Orange County (CA) ; I got some very strange RAW images.

    The image was heavily vignetted, which was mostly “fixed” in Lightroom. However, there is a distinct centeral round region in each image that is heavily overexposed. The images are basically unusable as astro shots. I don’t know how to account for it.

    Any ideas appreciated.

    • Ian Norman November 8, 2015 / 1:36 am

      Sounds like you need to stop down? If you were shooting at f/1.8, expect lots of vignetting. It’s possible that the adapter may cause vignetting issues too but less likely.

  6. Michael October 20, 2015 / 7:15 am

    Thanks for this informative review. What focal length do you recommend for capturing a wide sky and milky way?

    • Ian Norman November 8, 2015 / 1:37 am

      for wide angle, I usually recommend stuff that’s 24mm or shorter.

  7. Stephen September 26, 2015 / 12:30 am

    Thanks for writing this informative review. Do you think this lens would be suitable for an absolute beginner who wants to try taking pictures of the Aurora? I bought my wife a DLSR after lots of hints but she has never gotten into using it (I think it involves too many numbers). We are going to Tromso, Norway next February hopefully to see the northern lights directly above us. I was thinking that as this lens is well priced and small enough that she might consider taking it and trying to capture the lights. The f stop of less that 2.8 has been recommended and anything less than that is probably ideal. What do you suggest if you have an opinion worth sharing?
    Regards
    Stephen

  8. Keisha September 20, 2015 / 9:10 pm

    Great review! I’m trying to subscribe but it keeps saying “Invalid email adress”. Help please!

    • Ian Norman November 8, 2015 / 1:38 am

      We may have had a brief subscription form issue, did you work it out?

  9. Benjamin442 September 14, 2015 / 3:21 pm

    Hi,

    I’m a complete beginner (to photography in general) and have found your site really helpful so thanks!

    Can I asked the difference between the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens and theCanon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Lens (which you recommended for ‘Medium Format Astrophotography with Panorama Stitching‘)?

    Thanks,

    • Ian Norman September 14, 2015 / 3:54 pm

      The STM lens is the updated version of the mark II lens. They seem to share the same optics but the new STM design has a better focusing mechanism.

  10. Peter August 31, 2015 / 10:42 am

    Great review!
    I just found your great materials on astrophotography on your blog and youtube. Incredibly informative!

  11. Ryan August 9, 2015 / 1:30 pm

    Seems like a decent starter lens for someone looking to try out astro for cheap, but I can’t really think of a scenario where someone that already has one of the many good astro lenses would use this one instead.

    Good review!

    Looking forward to seeing anything that comes up about the Tamron 15-30, Sony 28/2, or Zeiss Batis 25/2 if you end up with your hands on them!

    • Ian Norman August 9, 2015 / 6:05 pm

      Ryan, I am working on the 28mm f/2 review at the moment. We will likely review the Tamron 15-30mm soon and the 25mm f/2 Batis as soon as it’s back in stores.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *