The Most Exciting Lenses for Astrophotography at Photokina 2014


Astrophotographers should be excited about many of the new lenses announced this year at the Photokina 2014 conference in Cologne, Germany. We see lots of fast lenses and that’s a very good thing.

Here is a quick list of all the new Astrophotography relevant lenses announced at Photokina 2014, who they’re for and why we’re excited about them.

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 20mm f/1.8G ED

For astrophotography, this is the lens that excites me the most from the Photokina 2014 conference. A fast 20mm lens is super valuable for astro work: it’s super wide angle of view and fast aperture will provide great views of the night sky and collect plenty of light. The fastest 20mm previously available  for DSLRs was the Sigma 20mm f/1.8 EX DG RF Aspherical but it is too soft wide open and has too much aberration at f/1.8 for astrophotography. Hopefully Nikon can keep aberrations to a minimum on this new offering. If they can, I expect this lens to be the best 20mm lens available for astro work. The cool thing about Nikon lenses is that they’re easily adaptable to other mounts via adapters like the Novoflex Nikon to Canon EOS or Novoflex Nikon to Sony NEX and others. It’s also reasonably affordable

Fits: Nikon F Mount
Check Price (Amazon) / Check Price (B&H)

Samyang /Rokinon 50mm f/1.4 AS UMC



This is the lens that we’ve all wanted Samyang to make for years now. It fills a gap in their already very good lineup of lenses and is their 4th lens with an aperture of f/1.4 (the others are the 24mm/1.4, 35mm/1.4, 85mm/1.4). We tend to love the lenses that come from Samyang. They’re typically very affordable, fast and have some of the best image quality of any of the lenses on the market. If it holds true to all their other lens designs, it will hopefully be great at correcting coma and astigmatism which should make for a great astrophotography lens. The only other 50mm lenses available that we recommend for astrophotography are the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art and the Zeiss Otus 55mm f/1.4 Distagon T*, both of which are markedly more expensive than the Samyang. A 50mm will be best used for making detailed astrophotography panorama stitches.

Fits: Canon EF, 4/3, Micro 4/3, Nikon F, Pentax, Samsung NX, Sony A, Sony E, Fuji X, and Canon M
Check Price (Amazon) / Check Price (B&H)

Samyang /Rokinon 12mm f/2.8 ED AS NCS Fisheye


Also from Samyang is a new 12mm/2.8 fisheye lens for full frame sensors. There are very few fast fisheye lenses available for full frame cameras and the Samyang / Rokinon 12mm f/2.8 should be one of the widest fast lenses that you can buy. With a field of view of 180 degrees from corner to corner, this lens should be great for large sweeping landscapes. We love their 8mm f/2.8 UMC Fisheye II  (full review here) version for APS-C mirrorless cameras so we’re excited to see an offering to full-frame DSLRs. We can’t wait to try this lens and apply our defishing method to the images.

Fits: Canon EF, 4/3, Micro 4/3, Nikon F, Pentax, Samsung NX, Sony A, Sony E, Fuji X, and Canon M
Check Price (Amazon) / Check Price (B&H)

Tamron SP 15-30mm f/2.8



The Tamron 15-30mm looks like it will be an affordable super wide angle option for full frame DSLRs. We’re particularly interested at how it will stack up against the comparable (but more expensive) and excellent Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED lens, and the affordable but manual focus Samyang / Rokinon 14mm f/2.8, some of our favorite super-wide angle choices for astrophotography. Tamron has always been second to Sigma in the third party lens market but consistently offers some great products. This offering is particularly unique because Sigma does not offer a fast full frame zoom in this range.

Fits: Canon EF, Nikon F
Check Price (Amazon) / Check Price (B&H)

Tokina 11-20mm f/2.8 DX


The older version of this lens, the Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 II is one of the best lenses for astrophotography on APS-C DSLRs and this updated version is expected to improve upon an already excellent lens. If you’re shooting on an APS-C DSLR body and want a super wide angle lens with autofocus, the 11-20mm should be near the top of your list.

Fits: Canon EF-S, Nikon F DX
Check Price (Amazon) Check Price (B&H)

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R


We’re huge fans of Fujifilm’s X camera system, it’s what we used exclusively while traveling through Europe. The Fujifilm X-T1 is small and light, great at low-light shooting and the new X-T10 is a perfect compact camera.  The 16mm f/1.4 is the last most needed lens for the system with an equivalent field of view of a 24mm lens and a fast f/1.4 aperture. It will be the fastest 16mm lens ever made for a consumer camera and it could very well be the best astrophotography lens available for the Fujifilm X System. Can’t wait to try this one out.

Fits: Fujifilm X Mount
Check Prices (Amazon) / Check Prices (B&H)

Sony Zeiss FE Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 ZA


Sony’s full frame mirrorless a7 series of cameras are excellent camera bodies but the FE lens system is very new and limited in selection with only a handful of slower zooms and a couple standard primes. The announcement of the new Zeiss FE Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 is the first dedicated f/1.4 lens for the Sony full frame mirrorless cameras so it should hopefully be a good compact choice for users with an a7, a7R or a7S who want to shoot in very low light conditions. An interesting thing about this lens is that it’s going to feature a de-clickable aperture ring with stops from f/1.4 to f/16 and an “A” setting for automatic aperture mode.

Fits: Sony E Mount
Check Prices (Amazon) / Check Prices (B&H)

Sony FE 28mm f/2.0


The Sony 28mm f/2.0 should be a compact fast wide angle lens for astrophotography on the full frame Sony mirrorless system cameras like the a7, a7R and a7S. There’s not a lot of information available about this lens yet but it’s likely to be the most affordable full frame lens available for the a7, a7R and a7S. We would have preferred to see something with a wider field of view  like a 20mm or 24mm,  but a 28mm will suffice. Hopefully its performance at f/2.0 has low levels of aberration for astrophotography.

Fits: Sony E Mount
Check Prices (Amazon) / Check Prices (B&H)

Zeiss Otus APO Planar T* 85mm f/1.4

While a little bit long for the more common sweeping landscapes that we’re used to shooting at Lonely Speck, the Otus 85mm f/1.4 is sure to live up to its steep price tag by offering the sharpest and cleanest image of nearly any 85mm lens. The Otus 55mm f/1.4 is already one of the best standard primes available and we anticipate the 85mm version to be even better. This lens should be excellent for super detailed panorama stitches and for capturing smaller night sky objects.

Fits: Nikon F and Canon EF Mount
Check Prices (Amazon) / Check Prices (B&H)

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm f/2.8 PROolympus-m-zuiko-digital-ed-7-14mm-f2.8-pro

The M.Zuiko 7-14mm f/2.8 has been in development for years now and should prove to be a top astrophotography choice for those with a Micro 4/3 camera. It will offer an extremely wide field of view and should be fast enough for astrophotography.

Fits: Micro 4/3
Check Prices (Amazon)Check Price (B&H)


We’re super excited to try out a select few of these lenses as they are released. Photographing the Milky Way is growing in popularity and lens manufacturers seem to be making a lot of suitable lenses for this photographic specialty.

It’s disappointing  that there were no announcements of suitable fast wide angle lenses from Canon. The current Canon EF lens lineup is doesn’t offer any really great choices for astrophotography in our opinion. Most of the fast wide angle lenses from Canon have far too much coma and astigmatism when shooting wide open and as a result we tend to not recommend them for astrophotography. Luckily for Canon users there are a lot of current and new lens offerings from third party lens manufacturers like Samyang / Rokinon, Sigma, Tokina, Tamron and Zeiss.

We were anticipating the announcement of a Sigma 24mm f/1.4 Art lens but it was never revealed at Photokina. Perhaps we’ll see it an other exciting products from the upcoming CP+ conference in Tokyo.

We hope to review a few select lenses from this list and more as they are announced. Are there any products that you want to see reviewed on Lonely Speck? Let us know in the comments.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites. We are also a participant in the B&H Affiliate Program which also allows us to earn fees by linking to

Learn Astrophotography

Astrophotography 101 is completely free for everyone. All of the lessons are available on the Lonely Speck Astrophotography 101 page for you to access at any time. Enter your email and whenever we post a new lesson you’ll receive it in your inbox. We won’t spam you and your email will stay secure. Furthermore, updates will be sent out only periodically, usually less than once per week.

Join 10 360 other subscribers.

Help us help you!

Believe it or not, Lonely Speck is my full-time job. It’s been an amazing experience for us to see a community develop around learning astrophotography and we’re so happy to be a small part of it. I have learned that amazing things happen when you ask for help so remember that we are always here for you. If you have any questions about photography or just want to share a story, contact us! If you find the articles here helpful, consider helping us out with a donation.


Thanks so much for being a part of our astrophotography adventure.


34 Responses

  1. John September 18, 2016 / 8:30 pm

    Hey Ian,

    Wondering if you will be testing the new Samyang/Rokinon AF 50mm 1.4 e Mount for astrophotography… Thinking of this for both portraits and astro work. 🙂

  2. Jeffrey Ip April 19, 2016 / 3:01 pm

    Hi Ian,

    Have you had a chance to test the Tamron 15-30? How does it deal with coma?

  3. William Shaw February 22, 2016 / 1:06 am

    I’ve just got started in this area and find your website brilliant – so thanks. Before I started reading here I bought the Nikon AF-S 20mm f/1.8 to put on my new D750, largely on the basis of the appraisals by dxomark and Ken Rockwell. Now it’s a great lens for daytime wide angle use, and I bought it for a combination of daytime and astro work, so it does part of the job fine. But for astro, I am a bit disappointed. On full frame at 1.8 the corner coma seems to me to be pretty weak and I reckon it’s only really usable in DX crop mode. Have you had chance to review this lens yourself yet? I have recently come across the review on which also suggests the coma is poor and not removed by stopping down, at least to 2.5. Their pictures are pretty much the same as what I see with my own lens. I’d love to know what you have found – I am a bit disgruntled with dxomark as it was listed as the best wide angle prime for the D750 and it is now clear to me that they pay little attention to coma. Nikon’s own web-site touts it as suitable for astro, esp when stopped down, but I not convinced by that either!

  4. Ohm December 9, 2015 / 6:31 am

    Which len is better between rokinon 14f2.8 and 12 f2.8?
    Thank you.

  5. Bruce McCredie October 17, 2015 / 5:47 am

    How would you rate the sigma 10-20 f3.5. I am looking for a versatile lens for both Astro and landscapes. Am also considering the Tokina 11-16 f2.8. Any feedback is much appreciated.

  6. Glenn October 10, 2015 / 10:24 pm

    I would love a report on chromatic aberration with the Tokina 11-20mm, I am presently debating between that and the Rokinon 10mm 2.8 or 16mm 2.0 for Nikon mount apsc. I would love any feedback.

    – Glenn

  7. Rick Whitacre June 27, 2015 / 2:36 pm

    Any word on coma for the Sony 28mm f/2, Ian?


    • Ian Norman June 27, 2015 / 4:05 pm

      Hey Rick, my first copy of the 28mm/2 was decentered so I had to send it back. That said, it had pretty minimal coma at f/2 but I want a good copy before making a final judgement. I’m receiving a replacement soon.

  8. Steve April 13, 2015 / 4:10 am

    Hi Ian,

    Thank you for your article, it’s really helpful!

    I just have one question, how much of the image quality is derived from the camera body when shooting scenes like the milky way?

    I am wanting to get into astrophotography, however I only have a ‘lower end’ Canon 1200D. Would there be a point in buying a good lens for this camera, or would upgrading the camera first be my only option for good results?


  9. bjorn vink March 1, 2015 / 12:51 am

    Dear Ian
    I tested the Nikkor 20mm f1.8 in New-Zealand, it’s a great performer in astrophotography, even wide open, it behaves very decent in the corner. If you stop down to f2.5 the coma is nearly gone. I tested it on a D800 and a D750–> suberb astro-body very usable up to Iso 12800 -even on jpg- New Zealand has some of the darkest skies on earth 🙂 I’m still processing the time-lapses, they will be shown on youtube. Nice lens since it’s lightweight when you’re hiking in the mountains.
    I use a Samyang 14mm / 35mm , 85mm / Sigma 15mm , Sigma Art 50mm for timelapsing

    • Ian Norman March 2, 2015 / 5:15 pm

      Awesome! I still really want to try that lens out!

    • William Shaw February 23, 2016 / 12:58 am

      Bjorn – do you have any posted imagery from your 20mm/1.8 taken on full frame? I’m wondering if I have a duff copy as I though the coma correction was pretty weak in the corners and not that well controlled by stopping down. I used a D750 and my corner frames looked a lot like the ones on Maybe I am expecting too much – it would be useful to see what you regard as “decent”. Thanks! (I shot using the settings from the Milky Way calculator here, and also for about half the time on a higher speed to check I was not confusing things with star trails).

  10. Dan Lesovsky February 20, 2015 / 9:33 pm

    I’m looking forward to the Sigma 24/1.4 ART. That should be another stellar lens! Even better if they release an A-mount version so we get EXIF data.

  11. Rich January 15, 2015 / 4:58 am

    Love the site! I like several others are looking forward to your review of the Nikon 20mm f1.8. Considering the specs I just haven’t really found anything talking about this lens for astro work.

    Keep up the great work

    • Ian Norman February 5, 2015 / 4:33 pm

      Hi Rich, the 20mm/1.8 is definitely on our list to review but it might be some time before we can personally acquire one.

  12. Armando December 23, 2014 / 2:20 pm

    Hi Ian,

    I just discovered your website and I am absolutely delighted with it, I really appreciate all the information you offer us in it.
    Some time ago I’m thinking about buying a Nikon mount lens for astrophotography (I own the D800) .When Nikon announced the new 20mm f1.8 at Photokina 2014, I thought it was the most appropriate for this discipline. Now I’m not sure if that is correct or whether it would be better to have a shorter focal length lens despite losing more than one f-stop in order to cover a larger area of sky (and include the Via Lactea). What would be better, Nikon 20mm f1.8 or Samyang 14mm f2.8?

    What do you think about a fisheye lens, specifically the also new Samyang 12mm f2.8? Could be used instead of the previous two or be just a complement?

    Thanks again for your work.

    • bjorn July 10, 2015 / 2:25 am

      Hi Armando
      Concerning the 20mm f1.8 Nikkor and 14mm Samyang, I own both, and like both. For Samyang select a good copy! It can be used from 2,8. I’ll some up a kind of review fot Fulframe:

      Nikkor some coma in the extreme corner at f1.8, it’s nearly gone at f2,5. In DX no issue at all. Bright lights, nearly no flares and if you close diafragm a bit you can get nice crisp starbursts. It happens when you’re time lapsing the night sky and the moon pops into the image. Samyang, has more light fall off, a bit lower coma, but is less resistant for bright sources in and around the frame. It’s more phrone to flare.

  13. Max December 8, 2014 / 2:12 pm

    The Zeiss 35/1.4 is going to be an exciting terrestrial lens, if it’s anything like the ze/zf versions. When I had the ZE 35/1.4 it did perform nicely on star fields as well. Wasn’t there a rumor of a 14-24/2.8 Sigma ART with front filter threads?… or was that not announced (yet)?

    • Ian Norman December 9, 2014 / 2:35 am

      Yeah, I can’t wait for the 35mm f/1.4. I’m sure there’s one or two rumors for a superwide Sigma but no one really knows…

  14. pablo December 2, 2014 / 9:56 pm

    So…. The Nikon 20mm f1.8 has been available for a while any news on how it handles in the real world? Particularly interested in how coma does in FX corners (have seen some mixed reviews).

    • Ian Norman December 2, 2014 / 10:55 pm

      Pablo, test shots I have seen from the 20/1.8 show almost no coma. I’m working on getting a hold of one in the coming weeks so stand by for the review.

  15. Chris November 17, 2014 / 6:30 am

    I know this is off topic, but what do you think of using the Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8G ED AF-S Nikkor Wide Angle Zoom Lens for astro photography?

    • Ian Norman November 17, 2014 / 3:47 pm

      The 14-24mm/2.8 is definitely one of the best lenses for the Nikon mount and it’s a higher quality alternative to the Rokinon 14mm/2.8 that I typically suggest.

  16. Don Leonard October 14, 2014 / 9:34 am

    Hi Ian,

    Gear question for you. I have a Grand Canyon hike planned for late March, and I’d like to do some astrophotography in addition to my normal landscape work.

    I shoot Fuji, and I’ve been eagerly anticipating the arrival of the 16mm f/1.4; I’ve always liked the 24mm equiv. focal length, and f/1.4 sounds like it would be perfect for shooting the stars. Unfortunately, it doesn’t appear like it will be released by then.

    So I was sitting here this morning trying to rationalize how I might go with Fuji’s very well-received 14mm f/2.8 instead. I was thinking about star trails, and how the shorter focal length of the 14mm (20mm equiv.) would allow a longer exposure before star trails begin appearing. It is hard for me to estimate whether it would be a full two stops-worth (the difference between f/1.4 and f/2.8), but it seems reasonable that I could shoot for longer than the back of the envelope 30 seconds at f/2.8.

    The prospect of being able to shoot at lower ISO with the 16mm excites me a lot, making me think maybe I should just be patient and hold off until this lens comes out. The consideration about the wider angle 14mm minimizing star trails and increasing the length of possible exposures weighs against that, although I know that I’m starting to run into sensor noise issues the longer the exposure lasts.

    Considering that I also own the 8mm Rokinon f/2.8 (per your recco) and the 18-55mm f/2.8-4 (so, 28mm f/2.8 equiv.), I am wondering how you would weigh these options when adding a new astrophotography toy to the arsenal.

    Thanks in advance,


    • Ian Norman October 14, 2014 / 6:35 pm


      In my experience with the Fujifilm XF 14mm f/2.8 R, the maximum shutter speed is about 25 seconds before star trails start becoming really noticeable. You can push 30+ but expect to start seeing some trailing.

      Now the jury is still out on the 16mm/1.4, no one’s ever used one yet so we don’t know how well it will work for stars. If it’s anything like the 23mm/1.4, it will still need to be stopped down by one stop (to f/2.0) before the edges of the frame really start to look excellent.

      I have no hesitation recommending the 14mm/2.8. It’s simply a very good lens and does astrophotography very well. If you’re looking for a wider field of view than your 18-55/2.8-4, it will suit your needs well.

      Also don’t forget the Rokinon 12mm/2.0. It’s got a nice wide field of view that’s just a hair larger than the 14mm and has that extra stop of light too. Keep in mind though, it’s manual focus only, just like the 8mm/2.8 fisheye.

    • Don Leonard October 27, 2014 / 4:01 pm

      Thanks, Ian. I appreciate the considered response. Maybe my play is to rent the 14mm for that week and try before I buy…

  17. Dave October 13, 2014 / 2:19 pm

    Nice round up! Im looking forward to the Zeiss Loxia 35/2, Im not sure if that was announced at Photokina though.

    • Ian Norman October 14, 2014 / 6:17 pm

      Dave, I too am looking forward to trying the new Loxia line. I didn’t list them here because it seems like the designs might not be geared toward astrophotography as they seem to be re-hashed versions of the older 50mm Planar and 35mm Biogon lenses for Leica cameras, both designs that have shown some pretty bad aberrations in the corners when shooting wide open. If I can get my hands on them I’ll try to test them out.


  18. Jono Manning October 13, 2014 / 12:44 pm

    Thanks for the round-up Ian! Very useful article. Exciting to see indeed and something for every budget! I’m sure you’ve got plans to test some of them? 😉

    • Ian Norman October 14, 2014 / 6:11 pm

      Thanks Jono, I’m particularly interested in that Samyang / Roki 50mm/1.4 and the New Nikkor 20mm/1.8. I’ll try my best to get some reviews together for at least those in the near future. Some of the others might not be released until 2015 so we’ll have to just be patient.

  19. Xaver October 13, 2014 / 12:39 pm

    Hi Ian, thanks a lot for this preview. I’m looking forward to read about the Sony 28/2. Also a comparison of the Sony Zeiss 35/1.4 to the new Loxia 35/2 would be interesting.

    • Ian Norman October 14, 2014 / 6:10 pm

      Xaver, I am also interested in the Loxia line too but an initial look at the specs and it seems like they might not be as suitable for astrophotography. It looks like the designs might be essentially re-packaged versions of the old Leica mount designs which aren’t too great with aberrations when shooting wide open. We’ll, of course, see what they’re like when they are released. Hope they’re good.

  20. al October 13, 2014 / 8:25 am

    wheres the voigtlander 10.5mm t0.95? This should be the most interesting astrology lens for m43 apart from the new olympus imo 🙂

    • Ian Norman October 13, 2014 / 9:52 am

      Al, thanks for the suggestion, looks like there were a few Voigtlander and Mitakon lenses that I left out. I’ll take a closer look and perhaps add some to this list.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *