Photographing the Milky Way with a Smartphone and the Future of Photography

Photographing the Milky Way with a Smartphone: Is it possible? An article by Ian Norman

Some believe that smartphones will never replace “real” cameras like DSLRs or mirrorless cameras. This article is about providing evidence to the contrary. It’s about making some amazing images with limited equipment. I anticipate the day that our slim pocketable smartphones will be more powerful and capable cameras than the the top-of-the-line DSLRs and mirrorless cameras available today.

This is my account of shooting my first smartphone images of the Milky Way with nothing but my OnePlus One smartphone and a tripod.


Yucca and the Milky Way, White Sands National Monument, NM, OnePlus One, 30s, f/2, ISO 3200


The photo you see above was made with a smartphone. Though smartphone sensor technology has actually been quite good these last couple years, it’s only just now that we’re seeing the right combination of sensors, lenses and software to make photographs that were once only possible on enthusiast-oriented, large sensor cameras.


My OnePlus One smartphone with the Bamboo StyleSwap Cover next to the Sony a7II

Many of today’s smartphones are seriously good cameras. They dominate the world of photography as the most common camera in the world. They have made photography more popular and more ubiquitous than it has ever been in history. Photography is thriving, and it’s almost solely because of the smartphone.

The smartphone’s progression into the professional and enthusiast realm is just starting. We’re already seeing smartphone manufacturers concentrating specifically on the phone’s camera as being the primary selling point. For example, the primary marketing campaign of the iPhone 6 has focused entirely on photographs shot on the iPhone.

I predict that smartphones, or some evolution of them, will become truly enthusiast-oriented and professional-level photography tools, equal to or better than the best cameras we use today. The current progression of available technology indicates that it is inevitable.

The OnePlus One Smartphone and Astrophotography

I recently purchased the camera with the most advanced sensor technology I’ve ever personally used. That camera is housed in a smartphone called the OnePlus One. That’s right. Better sensor technology than what you’ll find in your DSLR or mirrorless camera.

The OnePlus One. Via

The One was released a year ago on a limited invite-only basis and was opened to the public in April of 2015 for unrestricted purchase via OnePlus’s webstore. It houses a 13 megapixel sensor with a 3.79mm/2 lens. (Approximately equivalent to a 28mm field of view on a full frame camera) It’s actually not the largest or highest resolution sensor or the fastest lens found in a phone today, but its combination of hardware and easily-hackable software have made for one of the most capable smartphone cameras available so far.


The OnePlus One houses a 1/3.06″ Sony Exmor RS IMX214 Sensor and a 3.79mm f/2 lens

Only a few days after buying the OnePlus One, Diana and I departed on our All-American road trip through the southwestern United States. With no final destination in mind and no set schedule for the road trip, we’re capturing photos of our beloved home country, doing a little backpacking, and shooting a few astrophotos, too. You can follow the progress of our travels via our travel blogmy Instagram or Diana’s Instagram.

I packed a bunch of different cameras on this trip, including the Sony a7II with a bunch of lenses, the compact Sony RX100 III, an old 35mm film Olympus 35RD Rangefinder. But the camera that I was most excited to try using for astrophotography was my smartphone, the OnePlus One.


Using the OnePlus One on a cold morning at the Grand Canyon, Sony RX100M3, 1/125th, f/1.8, ISO 100, ND On

I suppose the thought of pushing any given type of gear to its limit really interests me. I always want to see what’s possible with the simplest of equipment and I feel that trying to shoot the Milky Way with a smartphone is sort of the holy grail version of that idea. I think that a smartphone is, quite possibly, the most minimalist friendly camera ever made, and the thought of being able to capture the Milky Way with one gives me a lot of satisfaction. Technology is getting there.

Photographing the Milky Way with a Smartphone

A few days into our trip, on our first night with clear skies in Valley of Fire State Park, I had my opportunity to use the OnePlus One smartphone to shoot photos of the Milky Way.


Valley of Fire, NV, OnePlus One, 3.79mm, 1/1750th, f/2, ISO 100

All of my shots from Valley of Fire were made around the park’s Arch Rock and Atlatl Campgrounds. Las Vegas is still less than 100 miles away from Valley of Fire, so we dealt with a fair amount of light pollution from the city, but the conditions were fair enough for shooting the Milky Way.

If you want to learn more about shooting the night sky, read my most popular article: How to Photograph the Milky Way or check out our complete list of tutorials at Astrophotography 101.

Initially, I started shooting with Camera FV-5, a paid app for Android that provides advanced levels of control akin to a DSLR. With the app it’s possible to control the ISO, shutter speed, white balance, and focus method. The aperture on most smartphones is completely fixed, which is the case on the OnePlus One. Therefore the OnePlus One’s aperture stays at a fixed f/2. That’s rather fast for a smartphone. (The iPhone 6 has an f/2.2 lens, for comparison). Camera FV-5’s advanced controls and interface design make it the first app I would recommend for performing long exposures on a smartphone. Only a few smartphones are capable of truly long exposures with an app like this, and the OnePlus One is one of the best available.


The OnePlus One smartphone photographing the Milky Way with Camera FV-5. Sony a7II, Voigtlander 15mm f/4.5 Heliar, 30s, f/4.5, ISO 1600

For support, I used a simple smartphone clamp that has a standard 1/4-20 tripod thread on it so that it can be mounted to any tripod.  I’ve been using two different tripods during my travels: the carbon fiber Sirui T-025X and the Dynamic Perception D-Pod. I used both for making the smartphone images in this post.

First Milky Way Test Shots with a Smartphone

For the first test shot — a few hours before the Milky Way Galactic Center would rise — I tried shooting a photo of our campsite at the maximum exposure possible on the app: 64 seconds, f/2, at ISO 3200. The results immediately looked promising: an ample amount of shadow detail, visible stars, and generally acceptable levels of noise. Straight out of the camera, the shot didn’t look that great, but with a little bit of noise reduction in post processing the photo doesn’t look half bad. That’s our little hatchback that we’re traveling in for the road trip.


Arch Rock Campground, Valley of Fire, NV, OnePlus One, 64s, f/2, ISO 3200, Processed

After a few hours, once the Milky Way’s Galactic Center was high enough in the sky to photograph, I tried my hand at my first ever photograph of the Milky Way with a smartphone. I dialed in the same exposure — 64 seconds, f/2, ISO 3200 — which is a little bit long for a typical Milky Way exposure, but I didn’t want to compromise the amount of light the camera could gather. The result straight out of the camera looked a little bit like this (pushed 2 stops in Lightroom to give you a better idea of noise):


Milky Way from Valley of Fire, NV, OnePlus One, 64s, f/2, ISO 3200, jpeg

There it is! The Milky Way galactic center was clearly visible in the shot, and I was excited to try some more. The long 64 second exposure certainly helped pull out more brightness from the scene but also caused some visible star trailing. Similar to our first exposure, the same speckled color noise is present, but it’s honestly not too bad.

Making Improvements: Noise Reduction via Stacking

After the first test shot, I figured I would try my hand at shooting a set of separate exposures to be stacked later in post processing for noise reduction. I shot three more photos, for a total of four images, and later post processed them using my image stacking technique. This technique allows us to gather more total light to combine together for a final image that will have less noise than a single exposure. By combining four exposures with identical framing to the one above and applying some careful noise reduction filtering, I was able to create this result:


Milky Way from Valley of Fire, NV, OnePlus One, 64s, f/2, ISO 3200, stack of 4 jpegs

Even better. I think the level of detail is more than acceptable and the reduction in noise using this stacking technique always produces improved results. The final thing that I started wondering about is what the results would look like when shooting in RAW instead of jpeg. One thing I observed while shooting is that jpegs from the phone seemed to lose a lot of color information, especially in the shadows, making the rocks appear green/grey rather than the red hue that they are naturally. The next thing I tried was enabling RAW capture for my exposures.

Making Improvements: RAW Long Exposures on a Smartphone

With the most recent update of Google’s Android 5 Lollipop, Android phones have just started getting the new Camera2 API capability for capturing RAW files and performing more advanced functions like manual focus. The OnePlus One doesn’t actually have the Camera2 API, but it does sport most of the necessary features through the use of an app like Camera FV-5. Other phones that support RAW capture with Camera FV-5 are the Nexus 5 and Nexus 6, but they don’t support extra long exposures (more than 0.8 seconds) like the OnePlus One.  With smartphones now shooting RAW, serious editing capability is becoming more and more possible. RAW files contain more total information and are usually much better for post processing than the typical jpeg format, especially in the case of astrophotography where we usually require big pushes in brightness when editing. 

Problems with RAW Recording and Long Exposures

RAW recording and long exposures is problematic on the OnePlus One. It’s possible, but there are some big issues. In any app that supports it, shooting in RAW with exposures longer than 2 seconds causes the camera driver to crash on the OnePlus One, requiring a restart of the phone. Camera FV-5 avoids this bug by forcing jpeg-only output for exposures longer than 2 seconds. In order to try to actually shoot in RAW for my next set of long exposure photos, I was able to instead use a community hacked version of Cyanogen Camera called CameraNext, which allowed me to force-capture in RAW at longer exposures — recording the image, but subsequently crashing the camera driver. In order to shoot these next images, I had to restart my phone each time in order to capture each subsequent RAW image. Here’s what a single RAW image looks like straight out of the phone, this time a 32-second exposure pushed two stops to show the level of noise:


Milky Way from Valley of Fire, NV, OnePlus One, 32s, f/2, ISO 3200, RAW, pushed +2 EV

There’s a lot more fine grain and noise present in the RAW files from the OnePlus One than the jpegs, especially a pinkish glow that seems to dominate the image. That said, the natural red color of the rocks at Valley of Fire is more visible in the RAW files, making the colors a little more representative of the real thing.   I imagine the jpeg engine applies a lot of noise reduction straight out of the camera, while shooting in RAW does not, but even so, the amount of hot pixels present in the jpegs is no longer as large. Using the same stacking technique mentioned earlier, the image below shows the improvements that are possible with a stack of 4 RAW exposures:


Milky Way from Valley of Fire, NV, OnePlus One, 32s, f/2, ISO 3200, Stack of 4 RAW frames

The shorter 32-second exposure was much more suitable for the OnePlus One’s 28mm equivalent lens. It kept the stars looking mostly like pinpoints while still being adequate for light gathering. One thing that I was surprised by was that the in-camera/phone processing of the jpegs did a great job at reducing noise in the shadows. I had a harder time with the RAW files at bringing out the shadow detail without introducing too much noise. I’m sure it has more to do with the variability in my processing technique, but I was actually quite happy with the jpegs, save for the certain lack of color in the deep shadows. Either way, the smartphone did a great job at producing a usable Milky Way shot — and on the first try, too.


Milky Way from Valley of Fire, NV, OnePlus One, 32s, f/2, ISO 3200, Panorama Stitch of 6 jpegs



I think that these photos are a testament to the progress of photographic technology and give light to the state of cameras in smartphones. Their capabilities are a lot better than most of us might think, but almost all of them are severely limited by software. Software apps like Camera FV-5, are delivering a more DSLR-like experience and also unlocking a lot of unused potential from smartphone cameras. Final usable resolution, even though from a 13 megapixel camera, is not quite as good as what you could get with a larger lens/sensor camera of similar resolution, but the result is still impressive and really speaks to the capability of the Sony Exmor RS sensor. Stacking multiple separate exposures always produces better results no matter which camera you use, and it’s through this technique of combining multiple images that I think smartphones will really start to improve imaging capability — automatically. (More on this idea later.) I still think that the software error on the OnePlus One that crashes the camera driver when attempting to shoot long exposures in RAW is completely unacceptable. For the time being, I’ll likely stick with Camera FV-5 which prevents the problem from happening by disabling RAW capture for exposures longer than 2 seconds. Hopefully OnePlus can fix these issues with a future release of software for the phone. Overall, my first experience photographing the Milky Way with a smartphone has me itching for the future. I’ve written more about my thoughts on how mobile photography will progress in the “Final Thoughts” section below.

Sample Photos of the Milky Way with a Smartphone

Diana and I continued our travels and eventually had another opportunity to shoot the night sky with the OnePlus One, this time from the magical setting of White Sands National Monument in New Mexico. We secured the last permit of the day for the backcountry hiking and camping trail. (Only ten permits are issued per day and it’s the only way you can stay in the park overnight.) After a beautiful sunset hike, being pelted with sand from the evening winds, being rained on, and a short nap, we woke at 2 AM to clear dark skies. Below are some results from that night:


White Sands National Monument, NM, OnePlus One, 30s, f/2, ISO 3200, stack of 4 jpegs

When I finally mustered the confidence to venture out into the dark, the clouds were just starting to part. Our tent was positioned at our assigned backcountry campsite #3, positioned on the desert floor between a set of dunes. The gypsum earth is hard and crusty in this area and a lot of grassy patches and wildflowers grow in these dune troughs. Still drowsy from my nap, I stayed near the tent for my initial photos. Once I was a little more awake, I set off up the sand dunes.


White Sands National Monument, NM, OnePlus One, 30s, f/2, ISO 3200, stack of 4 jpegs

A lone yucca plant grew out of one of the white dunes near our camp. Although we were almost 100 miles from El Paso, Texas, the city produced a lot of light pollution to the south, which is the orange glow you see behind all of the dunes. After spending some time shooting the yucca, I worked my way farther up to the crest of the dune.


White Sands National Monument, NM, OnePlus One, 30s, f/2, ISO 3200, stack of 2 jpegs

Each of the dunes runs like a snake from north to south, separated by the troughs that contain all the desert vegetation.  Although they are stark white during the day, the strong light pollution from El Paso colored the dunes orange in most of my night photos. The small bright spot behind the dunes to the far left of the image above is likely another photographer’s headlamp.

The above image is  a self portrait. I returned back down the dunes towards the Yucca plant and positioned the OnePlus One right next to it, pointing the lens up toward the galactic center. I took note of the position of the brightest part of the light pollution dome from El Paso and trudged directly up toward the glow, positioning myself right at the apex of the dune. In this case I used Camera FV-5’s interval function to take a number of consecutive 30-second exposures. I just made sure to stand extra still for the length of a couple photos and then picked the best frame. Before retiring the OnePlus One for the night, I made one final image of our tent with the smartphone, edited it with the Snapseed app and posted it to Instagram: 

  A photo posted by Ian Norman (Lonely Speck) (@inorman) on

An Un-Processed Smartphone Image of the Milky Way

Anyone who would like to see what the photos look like straight out of the phone, the below image is what the jpeg file looked like directly from Camera FV-5. You can click the link in the caption to download the original 13MP frame. The edited photo also has a link to the preset I used to achieve the results so you can see exactly how I did it. If you’re interested more in seeing how I process my photos, check out my Free Lightroom Presets.

Here's what a pho

Here’s what a photo looked like straight out of Camera FV-5. Click here for the original 13MP file.


And here’s the same photo after processing with this Lightroom Preset.

Final Thoughts on Hardware and the Future of Photography

The OnePlus One uses a fairly modern Sony IMX214 Exmor RS CMOS sensor, which is a 13MP stacked, back-illuminated CMOS sensor. It’s considered a sixth generation Exmor sensor, three full generations newer than the best Sony sensors available in DLSRs and mirrorless cameras (Sony, Nikon, and Fujifilm cameras all use Sony sensors in some form or another). If you’re interested in reading about the evolution of Exmor technology, and why Sony has some of the best sensor technology on the market, check out this great article from Darren Bessette of Framos.

Essentially, without going too deep into details about the sensor, the Exmor RS sensor is significantly more efficient and sensitive and has the electronics architecture to produce images with less noise and better detail, per pixel, than the more conventional CMOS sensor designs found in most full size DSLRs and enthusiast cameras. In other words, the OnePlus One and other smartphones that use similar camera sensors are more technologically advanced designs than our large sensor cameras.

Perhaps someday this is what a professional camera will look like.

Perhaps someday this is what a professional camera will look like. Maybe.

The OnePlus One’s sensor uses an older version of the Exmor RS. Other phones like the Samsung Galaxy S6 and Galaxy Note 4 and the upcoming LG G4 all have newer, larger (1/2.6” vs. smaller 1/3.06”) versions of the Exmor RS sensor.

Where the OnePlus One stands out is in its price and in the community behind it: it’s less than $350 for their 64GB Sandstone Black model, unlocked and world GSM capable. That’s nearly half the price of the other flagship phones out there. It’s also supported by a huge community of fans and developers that love to tinker with tech.

It’s through this awesome group of people that the One has acquired the capability to utilize its camera to the full potential. I’m convinced that it’s one of the only phones on the market that’s capable of fully utilizing its sensor, the other being the upcoming LG G4, with its newer, larger Exmor RS sensor, industry best f/1.8 lens, and enthusiast-oriented camera app that allows manual control and exposures up to 30 seconds long. The G4 is likely to be able to outperform the OnePlus One, but it’s also predicted to be priced around $600, twice as much as the base-level One.

What About Physics?

Now, even the latest and greatest smartphones still have physical limitations based on their lens and sensor sizes: it’s just not possible to collect as much total light with a smaller lens and smaller sensor. That’s the primary reason why smartphone cameras are not as good as large sensor DSLRs. Larger sensors and lenses collect more light, and this capability leads to generally higher image quality through cleaner images with less noise.

Physics dictates that a camera can only record as much light as it collects, and a smaller lens collects a lot less light. Assuming equal levels of sensor efficiency, the only way for a smartphone to collect more light using such a small lens is to increase the exposure time or increase the number of cameras.

That leads me to the technology that will help close the gap and help smartphones surpass the capability of current day DSLRs: multi-camera arrays.

The Future of Mobile Photography

Multi-camera arrays. In the same manner that I used multiple separate exposures on OnePlus One to enhance the results through image stacking, I can collect more light by increasing the total exposure time. A multi-camera array would allow a smartphone to perform the same operation automatically and instantaneously at the time of capture. Essentially, the more data we can collect at the time of capture, the cleaner and more detailed the photo will be.

This idea isn’t new. The practice of combining multiple exposures to create more detailed and less noisy photos is a technique that has been used for decades by astrophotographers. For practical (and financial) reasons the technique has always generally been performed with a single camera: shooting multiple exposures, one after another, and combining them together into a final, more detailed image. The manual process is slow and time-consuming but can yield greatly improved results.


While made with a full frame camera, this photograph of the constellation Orion is composed of multiple exposures, aligned and stacked to reduce noise and improve image quality. Sony a7S, FE 55mm/1.8, 4s, f/2, ISO 12800, 32 exposure stack

Certain modern cameras (the OnePlus One included) have image stacking features that can perform this multi-exposure operation by combining several consecutive exposures together in the camera. On Sony cameras like the RX100 III, it’s called “Multi-Frame Noise Reduction” and on the OnePlus One’s default camera app, the feature is called “Clear Image.” These multi-shot exposure modes noticeably improve image quality and reduce noise in many photographic situations, but they’re not practical for situations with moving subjects.

Using a similar method of combining multiple exposure to enhance image quality, Olympus has also released the OM-D E-M5 Mark II which can automatically use multiple consecutive exposures and a special sensor shift mechanism to record 40+ megapixel files from a 16 megapixel sensor. This superresolution feature also has the same issues of not being able to properly handle moving subjects. I wrote another article about how to make your own superresolution images on our sister photography site, Photon Collective.

In astrophotography, combining multiple exposures of the stars relies on re-alignment of the images (which I review in my stacking tutorial) or the use of a star tracker as the stars move across the sky with the rotation of the Earth. The consecutive exposure and alignment/tracking process requires a lot of time for both capture and for post processing. My photograph of the yucca from White Sands is an example of one of these stacks, a combination of 4 frames averaged together to reduce noise. The processed required two passes, one for the foreground and one for the sky. You can hover over the image to see what the original single frame looked like before stacking.

Being able to capture and process all of the separate images simultaneously by using a whole bunch of cameras (a multi-camera array), could bring this technique of image enhancement to the snapshot type of shooting that we’re typically accustomed to in most of our everyday photography. As much as I enjoy the process of shooting a multiple long exposure image stack with my smartphone, there’s definitely a better way, and that’s with more cameras, all shooting in parallel.

Smartphones are a perfect application for affordable multi-camera arrays. A smartphone camera module cost is in the tens of dollars. At the current price of about $20 per camera module, an array of 16 cameras in a smartphone would only cost about $320. As miniaturization progresses, it will be easier and easier to fit more and more camera modules into a single device — and at lower cost, too.

You already saw the improvement possible by combining 4 separate photos above. Now imagine if you had an array of 16 or more cameras that could perform the same operation instantaneously and automatically from a single device.

Light Multi-Camera Array Rendering

A startup company called Light has revealed their plans for a multi-camera array that’s targeted for use in smartphones. Via

There are already market indications that multi-camera array technology is going to come to our smartphones. In a recent news release, Apple Inc. acquired the Linx Imaging company, a group developing multi-camera array technology. Similarly, another startup company called Light recently announced a deal with Foxconn, the same manufacturer that Apple Inc. uses to build its iPhones and MacBooks. Light is pitching their multi-camera array technology as one that will be capable of matching the capability of a DSLR.

Combining the data from about 16 separate 1/2.6” sensors would allow a smartphone to start to approach the total light sensor area and light gathering capability of a typical DSLR sensor. A smartphone with the same total sensor area as a DSLR should be able to match the light gathering capability, thus coming closer to the image quality of the DSLR.

It’s with some form of this technology that smartphones will start to close the gap and catch up with larger sensor DSLRs. With all the recent tech-talk about multi-camera arrays, I imagine we’ll start seeing the technology come to smartphones soon.

Closing Remarks


The OnePlus One Shooting the Milky Way, Sony RX100M3, 8.8mm, 25s, f/2, ISO 1600

I hope this article presented some solid evidence for the rapid increase in the capability of smartphones. My photos of the Milky Way made on my smartphone don’t quite rival the quality of a full frame camera like the Sony a7S, but the results are exciting, nonetheless.

The camera in the OnePlus One is honestly severely limited by its physical size and yet it’s still possible, with some careful work and post processing, to create some photographs that were previously thought to be impossible on a smartphone.

If manufacturers continue developing hardware and software combinations, like in the OnePlus One and LG G4, that directly target the enthusiast-level camera, the smartphones of the future are going to be awesome.

Learn Astrophotography

I hope you enjoyed this article. If you’re interested in learning more about photographing the Milky Way, check out the rest of the Astrophotography 101 lessons or head straight on over to How to Photograph the Milky Way. If you have any questions or comments feel free to chime in on the comments below.

Astrophotography 101 is completely free for everyone. All of the lessons will be available on the Lonely Speck Astrophotography 101 page for you to access at any time. Enter your email and whenever we post a new lesson you’ll receive it in your inbox. We won’t spam you and your email will stay secure. Furthermore, updates will be sent out only periodically, no more than once per week.

Join 7 962 other subscribers.

Help us help you!

Believe it or not, Lonely Speck is a full-time job. It’s been an amazing experience for us to see a community develop around learning astrophotography and we’re so happy to be a small part of it. I have learned that amazing things happen when you ask for help so remember that we are always here for you. If you have any questions about photography or just want to share a story, contact us! If you find the articles here helpful, consider helping us out with a donation.


The biggest contribution comes from the use of our affiliate links. When you buy through the Amazon or B&H Photo links on Lonely Speck, it costs you nothing extra, but we will receive a small commission (usually 2-4%) to help run the site.

Thanks so much for being a part of our astrophotography adventure.


Back to Astrophotography 101


Ian Norman

Creator at Lonely Speck
Ian Norman, co-founder and creator of The Photon Collective and Lonely Speck. Ian is a full time traveler, photographer and entrepreneur. In February 2013, he called it quits on his 9-to-5 to pursue a lifestyle of photography. Follow Ian's photography adventures on Instagram.

67 Responses

  1. Sri Harsha Arangi February 16, 2017 / 10:13 pm

    Great Article! Thanks a lot! How did you go upto 64 sec with camera fv 5 app? I want to try with oneplus 3, but the max shutter speed it supports in 30 sec(both stock camera and fv-5).

  2. sams October 31, 2016 / 12:05 am

    Now, nice images can be generated from your smart phone. Camera specifications on smart phones today have been on par with the specifications kemaera-more sophisticated camera. If you are one of those people who do not want complicated with all the camera equipment and lenses are sometimes troublesome when taken away, enough with the camera of your smart phone, you’ve been able to capture a moment in your journey. recommendation if your smartphone is damaged thanks for sharing.

  3. makka August 27, 2016 / 2:12 pm

    Sorry, but your prediction of smartphones rivalling professional SLR’s is ludicrous. The quality of the lens and the person behind the camera make pro photos, not phones.

  4. Photo Avid July 5, 2016 / 7:16 pm

    I like your post. I have been looking at programs and apps that will do multi image averaging for noise reduction and low light enhancement. Photoacute for the PC looks good. I tried the trial version for my cell phone and it worked well even though the LG G5 was not listed as one of the profiles. The lite version does not include removable lens cameras, but the full version is more expensive. Looking on the websites on the cameras it supports, it does not look like the profiles have been updated in a while. I also found three Android apps, Camera Super Pixel, Cortex Camera, and A Better Camera. Camera Super Pixel takes several pictures automatically, but you cannot set how many pictures to take. Cortex Camera lets you set the number of pictures you want up to 100. A Better Camera has a night mode which averages several pictures, but I am not sure how many. It also has a Super Resolution mode if you are lucky and have a smart phone that it supports. It unfortunately does not support my G5.
    After testing some low light indoor pictures with the apps, my favorite so far has been Cortex Camera because of the large amount of pictures you can average. I will try to take some night time sky pictures with it some time, but I am not sure if I will ever get as amazing pictures as you have posted. Thanks for the tips.

  5. Randy Crockett June 2, 2016 / 10:14 am

    Hi Ian,
    Just stumbled on this article, so I downloaded FV-5 to play with it. I LOVE the app, great tip!
    Is there any way to get around the 0.8 sec exposure limit on the Nexus6?


  6. Joris May 30, 2016 / 2:41 pm

    Hi Ian!

    Reading this article a couple of months ago I had the idea of an app dedicated to astrophotography. It’s called Astrophotography Camera and it’s available on Play Store. The all project is still in early release so I’ve to struggle with some bugs but if you or some of your reader could try it and give me some feedback it would be great !

    Thank you for this article !

    • Ian Norman May 30, 2016 / 4:44 pm

      Badass! I’ll check it out!

  7. Facundo May 9, 2016 / 4:04 pm

    Hi Ian, one question, do you still use the Camera FV-5? I just downloaded it and didn’t understand the way to set the long exposure.
    Do you recommend other app with pro controls?
    Thanks and great article!

  8. Shyam January 21, 2016 / 6:23 am

    Thanks for such an informative article..
    I would like to know if oneplus x could handle such photography. With that i mean in comparison with oneplus one?

  9. Random Tune Belch November 11, 2015 / 7:54 pm

    Wow! I’m super impressed and inspired by your talent and the same can be said for this camera via One Plus One. Mine will be delivered tommorrow and I’m even more excited now. Thanks for the detailed posts and lovely images! I’m definitely saving your page. Be well. 🙂

  10. Fractal Hassan October 9, 2015 / 1:10 pm

    I was arbitrarily googling “Smartphone astrophotography” in order to make a better attempt at doing just such. With my luck I came across an article that uses the same phone as me. I have a OnePlus One phone. I bought said Camera FV-5 app, and for some reason, it wouldn’t even “click” for me. I’ve played around with the settings, including turning off the “don’t shoot if not in focus” option, and things like that. I’ve been able to get decent photos via stacking and postprocessing (see:, 22 frames 8s exposure taken and stacked yesterday) with the default camera. But I’d love to be able to take longer exposures (like for ISS passes and stuff), and I’m not sure why the app isn’t working, given that I have the same phone and phone model as you, and downloaded the same app. What were the exact app-specific settings you had it set to? The place I go (on the University of Florida campus, usually around 12AM-3AM) to take the photographs has, on a good night, a limiting magnitude of about 4.88, which was the dimmest star I saw (in Cassiopeia) with averted vision. I can see some faint splotches of the Milky Way on a good night. Will I even be able to capture the Milky Way with the app? Thanks for your help in advance!


  11. Le October 6, 2015 / 12:14 pm

    Can I take such photos with my Sony xperia z1 smart phone?

  12. Gerald September 21, 2015 / 8:40 pm

    Hi! I have a note 4 but I do not know if this will work the way i see the images in your post. Should I consider buying LG then?

  13. Beth Christman July 30, 2015 / 4:52 pm

    Woah, i Love that you have the opportunity to shoot in the desert! Your compositions are awesome! I also enjoyed your talk with camera phones catching the night skies. Really nice stuff! However, I am seeing a lot of noise in your shots. In my terms, way, way too much for my tastes. I reduce color noise and noise many different ways. Wondering if you use software? Being a DSLR, landscape photographer, I am really interested in what your opinions on camera phones and the future they may bring.

  14. Johan June 28, 2015 / 2:30 am

    Inspiring, informative and a lot of fun reading your article. I have a Galaxy S4 and due for an upgrade. I thought of no going for the upgrade and hang on to the S4. I think I should go for the OnePlus One. I also like their way of marketing the phone.

    I have just started with long exposure smartphone landscape photos doing sunrises at the beach. I have not been great and need to play more. I am using camerafv5

    I am excited to learn more from you and will do the courses you suggested.

    BTW: We love road trips going of the bean track on to dirt roads and into mountains in South Africa and many places are not polluted with light.

    Your selfie is cool. This is about how close I’ll get to taking a selfie. I have challenged my friends to a contest taking your kind of selfies using a cell phone.

    Can I buy the OnePlus One through your affiliate link (if they have such links)?

    Have fun


    • Ian Norman July 21, 2015 / 12:44 am

      I don’t think that OnePlus has an affiliate program Johan so don’t worry about it. I think the OnePlus One is a good bang for the buck camera and the camera is one of the best.


  15. Jeppe June 17, 2015 / 10:29 am

    I love this stuff, but can you share what you changed on your original FV-5 photo in snapseed? If we want to try this, we should know how to edit it right?

    Thanks in advance,


    • Ian Norman May 27, 2015 / 8:11 pm

      Is this from the oneplus one also? Seems like you have some camera shake or something in there but the galactic center is just visible. I’m sure a truly dark sky will make a big difference!

  16. Rick May 25, 2015 / 9:22 am

    Great shots, as always. I thoroughly appreciate the Droid-based architecture reasons for your use of the OnePlus, but since the US market is dominated by iPhone an attempt and comments by you might help shame Apple into making some changes and the article would appeal to a wider web audience.

    I also noticed that you mentioned taking a Sony RX100M3 on this trip. Since I just got that camera I am hoping you will be posting your normal stunning samples and comments about its use. Also, very curious about what you are using for remote control on that camera.

    Thanks for the beautiful shots.

    • Ian Norman May 27, 2015 / 8:07 pm

      Yeah Apple… maybe I’ll have a talk with some of my Apple Hardware friends…

      I have been shooting a lot with the RX100M3 and a review is incoming! I’ve been just using the built-in time-lapse app as an intervalometer. Haven’t really bothered to use the remote control app for smartphone control yet…

  17. Janick May 25, 2015 / 8:33 am

    Hi Ian,

    as everyone else already said: great article! I cannot wait to try it in Greece this summer…

    I read in your article that yoou are struggling with RAW capture and long exposure times.
    This error is indeed due to the camera driver of the OPO not being ready for the camera2 API. Unfortunately we have to live with this and wait for CM to fix it…

    Since you are using Camera FV-5 (like me) there is a worthy alternative: PNG!
    PNG is lossless and also shoots around 17-25MB per image. Great for post processing purposes (correct me if I’m wrong)…

    Have you considered this option?


    • Ian Norman May 27, 2015 / 7:02 pm

      A couple readers have pointed this out and I suppose I’ll need to try PNG and see how it goes.

  18. aaaa May 23, 2015 / 10:44 pm

    hi! just wondering what kind of post-processing you did on the snapseed app…i’m completely new to all of this and it’s amazing to see the unedited image from your smartphone next to the final version on instagram

    • Ian Norman May 24, 2015 / 8:27 pm

      Honestly it’s hard to say since Snapseed doesn’t allow me to save presets. Basically as I remember: increase brightness, decrease contrast, decrease warmth, increase saturation, increase structure. Edits will vary a lot depending on the conditions of the shot.

  19. Patrick Tam May 23, 2015 / 9:07 am

    Wow… Beautiful pictures…. I’ve been to white Sands, NM. I wish I would of stayed to see it at night…

  20. Deejay May 23, 2015 / 1:19 am

    Hi Ian,

    Really great article.
    One way to bypass the camera driver crash with slow shutter more then 2 seconds and RAW is to take pictures in PNG format. Png is lossless and outputs photos from 10 to 25 MB dependant on what you are shooting.
    They are great for editing…

    • Ian Norman May 24, 2015 / 8:28 pm

      Thanks deejay, I’ll have to try that and see how the pngs turn out.

  21. Pentti Jutila May 22, 2015 / 11:09 am

    Have ever tried Lumia 1020 (which have 41Mpix sensor) with raw files?
    Unfortunately we, here @ norther hemisphere, are now too “light” conditions but I’ll be trying with my Lumia 1020 on next fall with your advice milky way photographing 🙂
    Thanks for the good series of articles!

    Pentti Jutila

    • Ian Norman May 22, 2015 / 1:54 pm

      I have not tried the 1020. Are there any comparable apps that can enable long exposures for Windows Phone? The increased sensor size on the 1020 should help with low light but Milky Way shots will likely only be possible if you can do long exposures.

  22. Andre May 22, 2015 / 4:59 am

    hey, how did you make that orion shot with 55mm on a fullframe? extreme cropping?

  23. khokon May 22, 2015 / 1:09 am

    Message…it’s really a greater phone. thanks for it.

  24. JayC May 21, 2015 / 3:32 pm

    Great piece!

    I’m not sure I’ll be recreating that artwork anytime soon, but the level detail you go into is amazing. I can’t believe that you did evrything you describe here with the same phone I’m holding my hand right now 🙂 .

    Thank you for a really article!

    • Ian Norman May 21, 2015 / 8:58 pm

      You’re Welcome! I had fun making it. The phone is a great photography tool!

  25. Samuele May 21, 2015 / 2:41 pm

    that app to use the camera ? use an external optical drive of a camera normal or appropriate for one plus one ?

    • Ian Norman May 21, 2015 / 9:00 pm

      Hi Samuele,

      I used the Camera FV-5 app, available on the Google Play Store for like $5. The One was also updated to the latest Android 5 update. Other than that I didn’t use anything else other than a smartphone clamp and a tripod.

  26. Justin Smith May 21, 2015 / 12:54 pm

    Hi Ian,

    Great article, as always! You brought up something that I hadn’t given much thought to before you mentioned it, and that’s the High Res feature of the OM-D E-M5 ii. I know you say “This superresolution feature also has the same issues of not being able to properly handle moving subjects” but do you have any example shots that you can share to illustrate? I get the underlying physics (more shots over longer time = lack of pinpoint stars) but I’m curious how bad it actually looks.

    I did try searching Google and couldn’t find any articles specifically relating to the Mark II and the Milky Way or astrophotography in general.

    Keep up the great work man!
    – Justin

    • Ian Norman May 21, 2015 / 1:19 pm

      Justin, I don’t yet have first hand experience trying the Hi-Res mode for astro on the O-MD E-M5 II but I think there are some limitations on ISO, f/number and shutter length that might prevent it from being possible.

  27. Frode Leirvik May 21, 2015 / 11:57 am

    Thanks a lot for a truly inspiring and in-depth article!

    I have used my OnePlus One for several long exposure shots and with very little great managed to make some stunning shots. Stepping up to using tripods would certainly make a big difference. For the time being. I’m using only a simple docking stand I made out of Lego (no kidding!)…

    • Ian Norman May 21, 2015 / 1:13 pm

      It really is a great phone. Probably the first phone camera that I have no hesitation to use!

  28. Leon May 21, 2015 / 10:38 am

    Thanks for a great article! I am not an astrophotographer but I am very interested in stacking multiple exposures to increase detail, DR, etc, as described in your other Photon article.

    There is an Android app that actually does this, Almalence´s Better Camera app in its SUPER mode (only available on camera2 API devices, such as my Nexus5)
    There is also Huawei’s Honor6 Plus, which has a dual 8Mpix camera setup to produce 13Mpix images, by using I assume this kind of computational image processing tech.

    • Ian Norman May 21, 2015 / 1:12 pm

      Yeah, it’s a really fascinating method and one that we keep seeing more and more. I’m hoping that OnePlus One can get the Camera2 API soon.

  29. Tim May 21, 2015 / 8:44 am

    can this be done with an iPhone 6 ? Shooting the Milky Way?

    • Ian Norman May 21, 2015 / 9:23 am

      I have not yet personally tried it but certain apps like Slow Shutter Cam might make it possible.

  30. Gopi Raj May 21, 2015 / 3:02 am

    Excellent work!
    Tremendous effort and patience in bound. Which tripod have you used? Is it the same for both the phone and the SLR, just changed the mounts?

    • Ian Norman May 21, 2015 / 3:06 am

      Thank you Gopi. Same tripods for both, depending on the situation. All the phone shots from Valley of Fire were on the Sirui T-025X while the White Sands phone shots were on the Dynamic Perception D-Pod while the other was used for the a7II. Both tripods have Arca-Swiss compatible ball heads installed so I can use the same tripod plates on all my cameras.

  31. albertdrosl May 21, 2015 / 1:49 am

    thats just amazing Ian. I can’t imagine my iphone taking a shot like that 😀 I’ve never used a OnePlusOne but these smartphones with advances cameras definitely leave iPhones far behind them.

    Great tests and observations!

    • Ian Norman May 21, 2015 / 2:03 am

      Thanks Albert!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *