Hoya Red Intensifier Review: An Affordable Light Pollution Filter for Astrophotography

I don’t typically use filters for the type of astrophotography you see on Lonely Speck. Filtering for specific wavelengths of light is a common practice for astronomy and deep sky imaging. But most filters made specifically for astrophotography tend to be very specialized and very expensive. Luckily, there’s an option for those on a tight budget: the Hoya (Red) Intensifier (Red Enhancer RA54) Filter. In this short review, we test out the Hoya Intensifier while shooting the Milky Way from Trona Pinnacles, California.


Before trying the Hoya Red Enhancer filter, I had never used a filter for astrophotography. Other than the SharpStar2 for achieving precise focus on the stars, I didn’t know of an immediate reason to use a filter while shooting basic night photography.

Many dedicated astronomy filters are made to filter out everything but a very narrow band of light, specifically for targeting certain parts of the spectrum, like infrared or Hydrogen Alpha. These narrow band filters are usually best reserved for shooting on a full-spectrum camera or dedicated astronomy sensor. Other more common photographic filters like a UV filter, polarizer or neutral density filters don’t really provide any tangible benefits for astrophotography.

The Hoya Red Intensifier (Red Enhancer RA54)

The Hoya Red Intensifier (Red Enhancer RA54) (also just called the plain “Intensifier”) is a special application filter that’s intended to enhance red and orange colors, particularly for autumn foliage.

The Hoya Red Enhancer is also known as a Didymium filter. It filters out the yellow-orange portion of the spectrum from about 575nm to 600nm. The original application for a Didymium filter is to protect the vision of glassworkers from the bright yellow-orange color of the hot sodium in the glass. As I originally learned from Nick at Noctilove, this type of glass should make a good light pollution filter.

Hoya RA54 Red Enhancer Intensifier Filter Transmission Curve
The Hoya RA54 Enhancer filters out yellow-orange light from about 575nm to 600nm (via hoyafilter.com)


The part of the spectrum that the Didymium filter removes is also the exact color of most sodium vapor lamps, one of the most common sources of light pollution. Many city and suburban street lamps and industrial lighting use these yellow-orange lights. They’re slowly being replaced with LEDs in major cities, but sodium lamps are still one of the most common types of outdoor lighting. Being able to filter out most of this type of light should provides a distinct benefit for astrophotography.

Hoya Intensifier Filter for Astrophotography

At first glance, the Hoya Red Intensifier filter looks like a pretty plain filter. It’s a relatively clear looking filter but with a very subtle colored tint. It can appear pink, cyan or bluish, depending on the light it’s viewed under.

As far as I can tell, it appears that this filter does not have any anti-reflective coating as reflections off the surface of the filter glass appear to have no colored tint. A lack of coatings shouldn’t really affect most astrophotography but photographers should be aware when using it in other situations; it may cause unwanted reflections, particularly when shooting with very bright light sources in the frame.

Other than that, there’s nothing else to say about the appearance of the filter. It’s a pretty standard looking thing and comes in most common filter thread sizes from 49mm to 77mm.

Testing the Hoya Red Enhancer for Astrophotography

To test the Hoya Intensifier, I traveled with my girlfriend to Trona Pinnacles, California. It’s one of my favorite spots for astrophotography and is the site of our upcoming Lonely Speck Meetup 2016. Trona Pinnacles is a relatively dark sky location but there are still a few distict light pollution sources in the area: Ridgecrest to the west, Trona to the north, and Barstow to the South. Each of these towns create a mild orange glow visible in astrophotos.


Our test was made on a Sony a7S and two different lenses: the Voigtlander 21mm f/1.8 Ultron and the Sony Zeiss FE 55mm f/1.8 Sonnar T*. Each lens was fitted with a Hoya Red Intensifier for its respective filter size (58mm for the Voigtlander and 49mm for the Sony Zeiss).

Test shots were made in pairs: One set of shots was made with the filter removed and another identical set was made with the filter installed. The camera was set with identical settings for each set of shots. All photos were made with daylight white balance, manual exposure and manual focus. Let’s take a look at a first test shot:




This first test shot was made on the Voigtlander 21mm f/1.8 Ultron wide angle lens. The partially illuminated moon was still visible so the sky was naturally blue. As you can see, the filter noticably reduces the yellow glow created by the sodium vapor lamps of the mineral mining plant in Trona, California. The sky is darker and deeper blue and less hazy with the filter installed. Overall contrast is increased and you can see that the scene is slightly darker, likely since a portion of the ambient light spilling on the landscape is from the light pollution of Trona.

So far so good. The results were immediately noticeable, the filter seems to be doing its job of filtering out some light pollution.

Let’s take a look at another test image, this time of the Milky Way Galactic center, made after I had waited for the moon to set below the horizon.


This second test shot above was made with the Sony Zeiss FE 55mm f/1.8 Sonnar T*. Each image was made with the camera set to daylight white balance and by stacking 30 exposures to reduce noise. Images are normalized for brightness but post processing is otherwise identical between test images.

And below is a comparison of completely unedited images (exported straight from RAW) that should give you a good idea of the difference the Hoya Red Intensifier can make:


If you’d like to see these as straight-out-of-camera RAW files, check out the download link to a zip of 3 before and after pairs of shots shot using the Hoya Red Intensifier. The files included in the .zip below are unedited and exported directly to DNG.

Want to see some RAW before/after files?
Download a .zip of RAW files (65.9MB)

The advantages of the filter become a lot more apparent when shooting the galactic center. The Hoya Red Intensifier seems to have almost completely neutralized the yellow/amber hues caused by the distant town of Barstow. The image with the filter installed shows more variety in color, especially when it comes to the blue, red and orange nebula of Rho Ophiuchi around the star Antares. The photo without the filter still looks acceptable but editing the shot to include a good balance of color would be a lot more difficult to achieve due to the orange tint. Overall, the filter really seems to have made a positive difference in the results and I’m super happy with how pronounced the faint colors are when they aren’t drowned out by light pollution.

What about in heavily light-polluted areas?

In the comments below, Anthony Roggio asks: “Any shots with this filter in a heavily light-polluted setting? Somewhere near a major city maybe?”

I shot the following sample of the constellation Orion in Simi Valley California, near Los Angeles. It’s a pretty heavily light polluted area and the photos from the location initially had a lot of amber tint to them.


The light pollution filter seems to have completely neutralized the amber tint. I still think that the light from Los Angeles was too intense to really start to get some of the faintest nebula detail from the constellation Orion, but it’s neat to see how the filter removes the amber glow.

More Samples Made with the Hoya Red Intensifier Filter

I continued to shoot for the rest of the night with the Red Intensifier filter installed. Overall I’m very happy with how much staturation is apparent across the sky. Nebula are colorful, airglow (the green glow) is saturated and the bright light pollution on the horizon seemed greatly diminished from what I am typically familiar with at Trona Pinnacles. Here are a few more examples made with the filter installed:





Conclusions and Verdict

The results of using the Hoya Red Intensifier on the night sky is subtle but tangible. I very much prefer the results with the filter installed. I never thought I’d find myself thinking a filter as being essential for astrophotography but I think I’m going to keep using one on all my lenses. It’s cheap, it reduces light pollution, it works. Highly Recommended!

Hoya Red Intensifier Pros:

  • Greatly reduces the effect of light pollution, neutralizes yellow tinge from Sodium lamps
  • Affordable
  • Available in most common filter thread sizes (49mm-77mm)

Hoya Red Intensifier Cons:

  • Does not appear to have any anti-reflective coating
  • No square version available for filter systems
  • Reduces some light transmission

Hoya Red Intensifier Verdict:
Highly Recommended! (4.8/5)

Lonely Speck PureNight

We saw some of the shortcomings of the Hoya Intensifier and the requests by many photographers for a square version of the filter so we decided to make our own light pollution filter called the PureNight. PureNight is stronger in filtration than an intensifier, multi-coated for better anti-reflective properties and is now available in square 85mm, 100mm and 150mm sizes.

Lonely Speck PureNight Light Pollution Reduction Filter




We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites. We are also a participant in the B&H Affiliate Program which also allows us to earn fees by linking to bhphotovideo.com.

Learn Astrophotography

Astrophotography 101 is completely free for everyone. All of the lessons are available on the Lonely Speck Astrophotography 101 page for you to access at any time. Enter your email and whenever we post a new lesson you’ll receive it in your inbox. We won’t spam you and your email will stay secure. Furthermore, updates will be sent out only periodically, usually less than once per week.


Help us help you!

Believe it or not, Lonely Speck is my full-time job. It’s been an amazing experience for us to see a community develop around learning astrophotography and we’re so happy to be a small part of it. I have learned that amazing things happen when you ask for help so remember that we are always here for you. If you have any questions about photography or just want to share a story, contact us! If you find the articles here helpful, consider helping us out with a donation.

[button font_size=”16″ color=”#136e9f” text_color=”#ffffff” url=”https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_donations&business=lonelyspeckblog%40gmail.com&item_name=These+tips+help+keep+lonelyspeck.com+running.&currency_code=USD&source=url” target=”_blank”]Donate[/button]

Thanks so much for being a part of our astrophotography adventure.


103 Replies to “Hoya Red Intensifier Review: An Affordable Light Pollution Filter for Astrophotography”

  1. Hello Ian

    I had the chance to photograph nice aurora landscapes when I was in the Lofoten. After your good comments for the Sony 55mmf1.8 in low light I used this lens and the Loxia 21mm as well for some wider shots. Didn’t use much wider because all the time we were over-there the activity was rather low and remained close to the horizon.Here some of the images: https://adobe.ly/2qV9P69
    Panorama’s shot with the A7r3
    I used at some moments a “Red intensifier filter” for shots made nearby city lights. Forgot the fact everyone mentions not to use filters in front of lenses for the rather strange circular light artefacts you get when you leave a frontfilter in place.
    These artefacts were pronounced with the 55mmf1.8 but they were totally absent with my Loxia 21mmf2.8. Remember that I encountered the same problem some years ago with a Samyang 24mm with attached UV-filter.
    So my question is can I reproduce these effects at home with some kind of low light source. Tried this by photographing aurora images from my computerscreen but nothing….
    I’ve bought also some filters that I could place in my “Canon to Sony converter” and some you can place in front of the sensor in the camera. I can’t test if these artefacts would be present using when these “close to the sensor filters”. Wouldn’t like to wait until I’m in the Lofoten next year and spoil half of my shots and mis the good occasions. Maybe anyone tried this already and can clarify this problem.
    Thanks for any response.

    1. Hi Edward, thanks for sharing! Some top notch images you’ve made. Beautiful! The concentric rings are Newton Rings caused by the reflection of monochromatic light between two surfaces. Since the light from Aurora is nearly fully monochromatic, and since light acts like a wave, the partial reflection between the filter and the front lens element will cause constructive and destructive interference that appears like rings. Dark areas where the light destructively interferes and bright areas where it constructively interferes. The amount of reflective interference will depend highly on the lens design and coatings as well as the filter design and coatings. For the filter, the solution is to try to reduce the amount of reflection between the lens and the filter. Our PureNight Filter addresses this issue with high quality multilayer anti-reflective coatings. The PureNight will not produce Newton Rings. The Hoya Intensifier is uncoated and so it reflects much more light, causing the Newton Rings. Getting a multi-coated filter is generally the solution.

      If you wanted to try to test whether a setup will produce Newton Rings, you could photograph a surface that’s lit with a monochrome light light a low-pressure sodium vapor lamp could work. Similarly, using a green laser, reflected or diffused off of a matte white surface might be able to show newton rings.

    2. Thank-you for your comments regarding the images. And of course thank-you for sharing the knowledge regarding the Newton rings. Giving the possibility to test this out is a real welcome gift.
      Would rather try this before my departure because once over-there and the aurora lights up there is always to little time to de some experiments. I’ve a green laser with me and will check this later (forgot the charger but will find one).
      Could you try out your filter with monochromatic light just to check. Think it could be very interesting for all of us to know this.
      Filmed also a little with the A7s and made some time lapses with the a6000 + Samyang 12mm. Also a lens I bought because your review convinced me. I’ve two of them now as a a6300. All secondhand but performing like it should
      Movie: https://vimeo.com/209420902
      First come the filmed part, sometimes up-speeded or inverse followed by some time lapses.

    3. So could perform the test like you proposed. Used a green laser with the lens at infinity and different diafragma’s. Pointed the laser that way that the light was quit uniformly distributed on a white wall.
      So yes found back the Newton Rings. Were present with the lenses that I’ve here (mounted with a Hoya Intensifier):
      Sony 55mm f1.8
      Batis 18mm f2.8
      Samyang 35mm f1.4
      Will test the Loxia lens when I return home.
      Changing the diaphragm didn’t have an impact on the presence of these rings.
      On the counterpart an Astromink filter mounted before the sensor didn’t produce these artefacts. But the filter produced vignetting with the tested green laser (less with ambient light).
      Did you have the chance to test your filter.
      Ps: These rings are best visible when you put a lot of contrast.
      Friendly greetings

  2. Anyone tested one of these on portraits? I love doing portraits with flash at night, so I end up doing astrophotography at the same time as portraiture. I’d love to see some examples with people in them.

  3. I need to find a red enhancer filter for my Samyang 14mm, but they are all quite expensive and there isnt many to choose from, when it has to be 150×150 mm… I am living in Denmark and we have a lot of light pollution..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.