I don’t typically use filters for the type of astrophotography you see on Lonely Speck. Filtering for specific wavelengths of light is a common practice for astronomy and deep sky imaging. But most filters made specifically for astrophotography tend to be very specialized and very expensive. Luckily, there’s an option for those on a tight budget: the Hoya (Red) Intensifier Filter. In this short review, we test out the Hoya Intensifier while shooting the Milky Way from Trona Pinnacles, California.
Before trying the Hoya Intensifier, I had never used a filter for astrophotography. Other than the SharpStar2 for achieving precise focus on the stars, I didn’t know of an immediate reason to use a filter while shooting basic night photography.
Many dedicated astronomy filters are made to filter out everything but a very narrow band of light, specifically for targeting certain parts of the spectrum, like infrared or Hydrogen Alpha. These narrow band filters are usually best reserved for shooting on a full-spectrum camera or dedicated astronomy sensor. Other more common photographic filters like a UV filter, polarizer or neutral density filters don’t really provide any tangible benefits for astrophotography.
The Hoya Red Intensifier
The Hoya Red Intensifier (also just called the plain “Intensifier”) is a special application filter that’s intended to enhance red and orange colors, particularly for autumn foliage.
The Hoya Red Intensfier is also known as a Didymium filter. It filters out the yellow-orange portion of the spectrum from about 575nm to 600nm. The original application for a Didymium filter is to protect the vision of glassworkers from the bright yellow-orange color of the hot sodium in the glass. As I originally learned from Nick at Noctilove, this type of glass should make a good light pollution filter.
The part of the spectrum that the Didymium filter removes is also the exact color of most sodium vapor lamps, one of the most common sources of light pollution. Many city and suburban street lamps and industrial lighting use these yellow-orange lights. They’re slowly being replaced with LEDs in major cities, but sodium lamps are still one of the most common types of outdoor lighting. Being able to filter out most of this type of light should provides a distinct benefit for astrophotography.
At first glance, the Hoya Red Intensifier filter looks like a pretty plain filter. It’s a relatively clear looking filter but with a very subtle pink tint.
As far as I can tell, it appears that this filter does not have any anti-reflective coating as reflections off the surface of the filter glass appear to have no colored tint. A lack of coatings shouldn’t really affect most astrophotography but photographers should be aware when using it in other situations; it may cause unwanted reflections, particularly when shooting with very bright light sources in the frame.
Other than that, there’s nothing else to say about the appearance of the filter. It’s a pretty standard looking thing and comes in most common filter thread sizes from 49mm to 77mm.
Testing the Hoya Red Intensifier for Astrophotography
To test the Hoya Intensifier, I traveled with my girlfriend to Trona Pinnacles, California. It’s one of my favorite spots for astrophotography and is the site of our upcoming Lonely Speck Meetup 2016. Trona Pinnacles is a relatively dark sky location but there are still a few distict light pollution sources in the area: Ridgecrest to the west, Trona to the north, and Barstow to the South. Each of these towns create a mild orange glow visible in astrophotos.
Our test was made on a Sony a7S and two different lenses: the Voigtlander 21mm f/1.8 Ultron and the Sony Zeiss FE 55mm f/1.8 Sonnar T*. Each lens was fitted with a Hoya Red Intensifier for its respective filter size (58mm for the Voigtlander and 49mm for the Sony Zeiss).
Test shots were made in pairs: One set of shots was made with the filter removed and another identical set was made with the filter installed. The camera was set with identical settings for each set of shots. All photos were made with daylight white balance, manual exposure and manual focus. Let’s take a look at a first test shot:
Drag the center slider to see the result without (before) and with (after) the Hoya Red Intensifier filter.
This first test shot was made on the Voigtlander 21mm f/1.8 Ultron wide angle lens. The partially illuminated moon was still visible so the sky was naturally blue. As you can see, the filter noticably reduces the yellow glow created by the sodium vapor lamps of the mineral mining plant in Trona, California. The sky is darker and deeper blue and less hazy with the filter installed. Overall contrast is increased and you can see that the scene is slightly darker, likely since a portion of the ambient light spilling on the landscape is from the light pollution of Trona.
So far so good. The results were immediately noticeable, the filter seems to be doing its job of filtering out some light pollution.
Let’s take a look at another test image, this time of the Milky Way Galactic center, made after I had waited for the moon to set below the horizon.
This second test shot above was made with the Sony Zeiss FE 55mm f/1.8 Sonnar T*. Each image was made with the camera set to daylight white balance and by stacking 30 exposures to reduce noise. Images are normalized for brightness but post processing is otherwise identical between test images.
And below is a comparison of completely unedited images (exported straight from RAW) that should give you a good idea of the difference the Hoya Red Intensifier can make:
If you’d like to see these as straight-out-of-camera RAW files, check out the download link to a zip of 3 before and after pairs of shots shot using the Hoya Red Intensifier. The files included in the .zip below are unedited and exported directly to DNG.
Want to see some RAW before/after files?
Download a .zip of RAW files (65.9MB)
The advantages of the filter become a lot more apparent when shooting the galactic center. The Hoya Red Intensifier seems to have almost completely neutralized the yellow/amber hues caused by the distant town of Barstow. The image with the filter installed shows more variety in color, especially when it comes to the blue, red and orange nebula of Rho Ophiuchi around the star Antares. The photo without the filter still looks acceptable but editing the shot to include a good balance of color would be a lot more difficult to achieve due to the orange tint. Overall, the filter really seems to have made a positive difference in the results and I’m super happy with how pronounced the faint colors are when they aren’t drowned out by light pollution.
What about in heavily light-polluted areas?
In the comments below, Anthony Roggio asks: “Any shots with this filter in a heavily light-polluted setting? Somewhere near a major city maybe?”
I shot the following sample of the constellation Orion in Simi Valley California, near Los Angeles. It’s a pretty heavily light polluted area and the photos from the location initially had a lot of amber tint to them.
The light pollution filter seems to have completely neutralized the amber tint. I still think that the light from Los Angeles was too intense to really start to get some of the faintest nebula detail from the constellation Orion, but it’s neat to see how the filter removes the amber glow.
More Samples Made with the Hoya Red Intensifier Filter
I continued to shoot for the rest of the night with the Red Intensifier filter installed. Overall I’m very happy with how much staturation is apparent across the sky. Nebula are colorful, airglow (the green glow) is saturated and the bright light pollution on the horizon seemed greatly diminished from what I am typically familiar with at Trona Pinnacles. Here are a few more examples made with the filter installed:
Conclusions and Verdict
The results of using the Hoya Red Intensifier on the night sky is subtle but tangible. I very much prefer the results with the filter installed. I never thought I’d find myself thinking a filter as being essential for astrophotography but I think I’m going to keep using one on all my lenses. It’s cheap, it reduces light pollution, it works. Highly Recommended!
Hoya Red Intensifier Pros:
- Greatly reduces the effect of light pollution, neutralizes yellow tinge from Sodium lamps
- Available in most common filter thread sizes (49mm-77mm)
Hoya Red Intensifier Cons:
- Does not appear to have any anti-reflective coating
- No square version available for filter systems
- Reduces some light transmission
Hoya Red Intensifier Verdict:
Highly Recommended! (4.8/5)
Lonely Speck PureNight
We saw some of the shortcomings of the Hoya Intensifier and the requests by many photographers for a square version of the filter so we’re trying to make our own intensifier called the PureNight. PureNight will be multi-coated for better anti-reflective properties and our first run will be available in square 85mm and 100mm sizes. PureNight is available for pre-order now.
Where to Buy
I personally buy almost all of my equipment through B&H or Amazon. They have excellent return policies and have the lowest prices anywhere online. If you are considering buying this lens or any equipment for that matter, consider buying through the links on this page. You won’t pay anything extra but Lonely Speck will receive a small commission (usually 2-4%) to help run the website. Here’s the list of gear used on this review. Use these links to help us out:
- Hoya (Red) Intensifier (Amazon / B&H)
- Make sure you buy one labeled just plain “Intensifier” or “Red Intensifier”. The Blue and Green ones are not the same.
- Voigtlander 21mm f/1.8 (Amazon / B&H)
- Sony Zeiss FE 55mm f/1.8 Sonnar T* (Amazon / B&H)
- Sony a7S (Amazon / B&H)
Astrophotography 101 is completely free for everyone. All of the lessons are available on the Lonely Speck Astrophotography 101 page for you to access at any time. Enter your email and whenever we post a new lesson you’ll receive it in your inbox. We won’t spam you and your email will stay secure. Furthermore, updates will be sent out only periodically, usually less than once per week.
Help us help you!
Believe it or not, Lonely Speck is a full-time job. It’s been an amazing experience for us to see a community develop around learning astrophotography and we’re so happy to be a small part of it. I have learned that amazing things happen when you ask for help so remember that we are always here for you. If you have any questions about photography or just want to share a story, contact us! If you find the articles here helpful, consider helping us out with a donation.Donate
Once again, the biggest contribution comes from the use of our affiliate links. When you buy through the links on Lonely Speck, it costs you nothing extra, but we will receive a small commission to help run the site.
Thanks so much for being a part of our astrophotography adventure.
Latest posts by Ian Norman (see all)
- How to Find the Best ISO for Astrophotography: Dynamic Range and Noise - March 17, 2017
- Lonely Speck on the Photog Adventures Podcast - March 14, 2017
- Rokinon 20mm f/1.8 Astrophotography Review: Joshua Tree National Park - March 10, 2017